Litigation Funding

EC v JC [2024] EWFC 175 (B)

Judgment date: 13 June 2024 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2024/175.html DJ Hatvany. Final financial remedies hearing in a where the assets were modest. The parties were married for 11 years and had twin boys aged 9. An unfortunate feature of this case was that

Simon v (1) Simon (2) Integro Funding Limited (‘Level’) [2024] EWFC 160

Judgment date: 02 July 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/160 Peel J. The last instalment in the Simon v Simon & Level family court litigation. Level’s civil claim is yet to be determined. Peel J found that the family court cannot make a distributive order upon

Simon v (1) Simon (2) Integro Funding Limited (‘Level’) [2023] EWCA Civ 1048

Judgment date: 15 September 2023 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1048 King LJ, Moylan LJ and Popplewell LJ. Appeal concerning the role of a litigation lender in financial remedy proceedings. Previous hearing summarised here. The parties had entered into a consent order in 2021 which effectively deprived

Simon v Simon & Level (Joinder) (Rev1) [2022] EWFC 29

Judgment date: 21 March 2022 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2022/29.html Nicholas Cusworth QC. Convoluted procedural history in which a consent order was sealed by the court without knowledge of other relevant applications, and W received no liquid capital capable of being used to repay

Can a Litigation Funder Rely on Any Form of Equitable Lien

Can a Litigation Funder Rely on Any Form of Equitable Lien

Funding family proceedings LS v PS [2021] EWFC 108 (23 December 2021), Roberts J concerns an application by a litigation funder (Q), as intervener in financial provision proceedings, for disclosure of material arising between a husband and wife and in relation to their settlement of LS’s financial order proceedings.

LS v PS [2021] EWHC 3508 (Fam)

Judgment date: 18 January 2022 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2021/108.html Roberts J. An application by an intervenor in financial remedy proceedings for disclosure of privileged material from a PFDR was refused. The intervenor, a litigation funder, is seeking to set aside a consent order