Disclosure

A v M (No 3) [2024] EWFC 299

Judgment date: 25 October 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/299 Cohen J. Application by H to strike out W’s application to set aside a final order in financial remedies proceedings on the ground of H’s misrepresentation. Background For a full summary of the facts and

HJB v WPB [2024] EWFC 187

Judgment date: 10 July 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/187 HHJ Vincent. Preliminary hearing to determine whether parties should be held to a separation agreement. Agreement found to be ‘presumptively dispositive’. An agreement will not be unpicked merely because a business has thereafter performed well. Background H

NW v BH [2024] EWFC 118 (B)

Judgment date: 23 May 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2024/118 Recorder Rhys Taylor. Evidentially complex final hearing in needs-based case involving verbal Daniels v Walker application, abandoning of SJE report, disclosure inadequacies, and an intervenor being removed. H & W cohabited from 2008, married 2018 and

VS v OP (Litigation Misconduct, Quasi-Inquisitorial Approach and Inferences) [2024] EWFC 190 (B)

Judgment date: 18 July 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2024/190 Recorder Chandler KC’s final order was 67% to H and 33% to W, the non-compliant party, and an SPP order in W’s favour even though she did not attend, had not made full disclosure

KFK v DQD [2024] EWFC 78 (B)

Judgment date: 03 April 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2024/78 Recorder Rhys Taylor. Modest asset needs case. Issues in the case: add-back, adverse inference, beneficial interests, dishonesty, family loans and resources, nature of business assets (income vs capital resource), non-disclosure, presumption of advancement, treatment of debts,

TYB v CAR (Non-Disclosure) [2023] EWFC 261 (B)

Judgment date: 16 December 2023 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2023/261.html DDJ Hodson. What does the court do with the non-discloser? Final hearing involving a short marriage with a child almost four. This was a needs case. H admitted earnings of £60,000 pcm, spending

Y v Z [2024] EWFC 4

Judgment date: 16 January 2024 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2024/4.html Peel J’s determination of M’s Schedule 1 application against F, who is a member of a Middle Eastern royal family. M’s application for financial provision under Schedule 1 of the Children