national archives Companies Stalo Michael v Mario Michael [2025] EWFC 245 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/245?query=2025+EWFC+245 HHJ Hess (sitting as DHCJ) Related Ramana v Kist-Ramana [2025] EWCA Civ 1022 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2025/1022?court=ewca%2Fciv&court=ewca%2Fcrim&court=ewhc%2Ffam&court=ewfc Helliwell v Entwistle [2025] EWCA Civ 1055 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2025/1055?court=ewca%2Fciv BC v BC [2025] EWFC 236 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/236?court=ewhc%2Ffam&court=ewfc Read the journal Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 2 | Summer Related Ramana v Kist-Ramana [2025] EWCA Civ 1022 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2025/1022?court=ewca%2Fciv&court=ewca%2Fcrim&court=ewhc%2Ffam&court=ewfc Helliwell v Entwistle [2025] EWCA Civ 1055 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2025/1055?court=ewca%2Fciv BC v BC [2025] EWFC 236 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/236?court=ewhc%2Ffam&court=ewfc Latest A Divorce, Gaslighting, Lack of Transparency, and a Port Emma Brunning and Dharshica Thanarajasingham (with Alexander Thorpe KC and Saima Younis) represented the wife in TF v SF [2025] EWHC 1959 (Fam). The judge had to untangle a web of hidden assets, misleading disclosures and a multi-million-pound port deal to determine a fair financial settlement. In Defence of Legal Fee Loans: The Economics of Access to Justice The recent High Court judgment of Peel J in 𝘚𝘪𝘮𝘰𝘯 𝘷 𝘓𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘭 [2025] EWFC 89 has renewed focus on the role of legal fee lending in family proceedings. This coincides with significant judicial commentary about funding arrangements, including notable judgments in 𝘋𝘚𝘋 𝘷 𝘔𝘑𝘞 and 𝘓𝘐 𝘷 𝘍𝘛. Final Reflections on Standish: Was It All Worthwhile? If asked, Mr Standish may say that three rounds of litigation, with another to follow, were worth it – Mrs Standish, perhaps not. But for lawyers, with many questions left unanswered, and a feeling that the opportunity to settle the law on matrimonialisation with clarity and certainty has passed us by, is curated by The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS
Ramana v Kist-Ramana [2025] EWCA Civ 1022 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2025/1022?court=ewca%2Fciv&court=ewca%2Fcrim&court=ewhc%2Ffam&court=ewfc
Helliwell v Entwistle [2025] EWCA Civ 1055 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2025/1055?court=ewca%2Fciv
BC v BC [2025] EWFC 236 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/236?court=ewhc%2Ffam&court=ewfc
Ramana v Kist-Ramana [2025] EWCA Civ 1022 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2025/1022?court=ewca%2Fciv&court=ewca%2Fcrim&court=ewhc%2Ffam&court=ewfc
Helliwell v Entwistle [2025] EWCA Civ 1055 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2025/1055?court=ewca%2Fciv
BC v BC [2025] EWFC 236 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/236?court=ewhc%2Ffam&court=ewfc
A Divorce, Gaslighting, Lack of Transparency, and a Port Emma Brunning and Dharshica Thanarajasingham (with Alexander Thorpe KC and Saima Younis) represented the wife in TF v SF [2025] EWHC 1959 (Fam). The judge had to untangle a web of hidden assets, misleading disclosures and a multi-million-pound port deal to determine a fair financial settlement.
In Defence of Legal Fee Loans: The Economics of Access to Justice The recent High Court judgment of Peel J in 𝘚𝘪𝘮𝘰𝘯 𝘷 𝘓𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘭 [2025] EWFC 89 has renewed focus on the role of legal fee lending in family proceedings. This coincides with significant judicial commentary about funding arrangements, including notable judgments in 𝘋𝘚𝘋 𝘷 𝘔𝘑𝘞 and 𝘓𝘐 𝘷 𝘍𝘛.
Final Reflections on Standish: Was It All Worthwhile? If asked, Mr Standish may say that three rounds of litigation, with another to follow, were worth it – Mrs Standish, perhaps not. But for lawyers, with many questions left unanswered, and a feeling that the opportunity to settle the law on matrimonialisation with clarity and certainty has passed us by,