SR v HR [2018] EWHC 606 (Fam)

Judgment date: 23 March 2018

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2018/606.html

Related

Fotheringhame v Nelson [2026] EWHC 632 (Ch)

27 March 2026. HHJ Klein (sitting as a High Court judge). TLATA 1996 case concerning a post-separation change in intention, where the appellant also sought to recover outstanding child maintenance payments.

KI v SI (Sham Trusts and Intervenor Proceedings in Financial Remedy Claims) [2026] EWFC 73 (B)

Judgment of District Judge Hatvany at a preliminary issue hearing concerning the determination of whether purported trust deeds in favour of intervenors within financial remedy claims were shams.

K v K [2026] EWFC 83 (B)

DJ Parker’s decision emphasises the importance of the court transcript where there is a dispute as to what was said by the judge. Ultimately H’s application to set aside a final order by consent failed because H was wrong; the FDR judge had not given him a 28-day cooling off period.

Read the journal

Related

Fotheringhame v Nelson [2026] EWHC 632 (Ch)

27 March 2026. HHJ Klein (sitting as a High Court judge). TLATA 1996 case concerning a post-separation change in intention, where the appellant also sought to recover outstanding child maintenance payments.

KI v SI (Sham Trusts and Intervenor Proceedings in Financial Remedy Claims) [2026] EWFC 73 (B)

Judgment of District Judge Hatvany at a preliminary issue hearing concerning the determination of whether purported trust deeds in favour of intervenors within financial remedy claims were shams.

K v K [2026] EWFC 83 (B)

DJ Parker’s decision emphasises the importance of the court transcript where there is a dispute as to what was said by the judge. Ultimately H’s application to set aside a final order by consent failed because H was wrong; the FDR judge had not given him a 28-day cooling off period.

Latest

The Astonishing Fate of Scott v Scott (1911-1913)

The Astonishing Fate of Scott v Scott (1911-1913)

Secrecy in family cases from the Court for Divorce and Matrimonial Causes (1858) to the Financial Remedies Court (2024)

The Consequences of Late Service of an N260 for Summary Assessment of Costs: Prejudice and Proportionality

The Consequences of Late Service of an N260 for Summary Assessment of Costs: Prejudice and Proportionality

The requirement to serve a statement of costs (Form N260) for the purposes of summary assessment of costs is set out in CPR PD 44 para 9.5. But what are the consequences of a breach of the rule to serve the statement of costs not less than 24 hours before the start of the hearing?

Is It Time for the Conclusions in Waggott to Be Reconsidered?

Is It Time for the Conclusions in Waggott to Be Reconsidered?

There is arguably a far greater understanding now than there was even as recently as 2018 of domestic abuse and the wide-reaching and long-lasting impact that it can have. Does this mean it is time for the Court of Appeal to reconsider the conclusions it reached in Waggott?

is curated by

The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software

EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS