Sorrell v Sorrell [2005] EWHC 1717 (Fam)
Judgment date: 29 July 2005
Related
SS v IS [2023] EWHC 1544 (Fam)
Judgment date: 14 June 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/1544
Roberts J. Final hearing in financial remedy proceedings with issues around spousal maintenance, offshore trusts and non-matrimonial assets.
Background
The parties met as students in 2003 in Russia and married in 2004. They had essentially no
DR v UG [2023] EWFC 68
Judgment date: 05 April 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2023/68
Moor J. The parties were Danish. H was aged 57 and W aged 49. Children aged 18, 16, and 16. Married 2004, marriage broke down in 2019.
H was CEO of a drugs manufacturer but staged a
Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24, [2006] 1 FLR 1186
Judgment date: 24 May 2006
http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2006/24.html
Read the journal


Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 2 | Summer
Related
SS v IS [2023] EWHC 1544 (Fam)
Judgment date: 14 June 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/1544
Roberts J. Final hearing in financial remedy proceedings with issues around spousal maintenance, offshore trusts and non-matrimonial assets.
Background
The parties met as students in 2003 in Russia and married in 2004. They had essentially no
DR v UG [2023] EWFC 68
Judgment date: 05 April 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2023/68
Moor J. The parties were Danish. H was aged 57 and W aged 49. Children aged 18, 16, and 16. Married 2004, marriage broke down in 2019.
H was CEO of a drugs manufacturer but staged a
Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24, [2006] 1 FLR 1186
Judgment date: 24 May 2006
http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2006/24.html
Latest

Open Justice in the Modern Age
A guest lecture delivered on Tuesday, 7 October 2025, at 6pm, at George Town, Grand Cayman.

Applied Theatre and the Advocacy Gap in Financial Remedies
Closing the gap between legal recognition and judicial persuasion.

War (of the Roses) – What Is It Good For?
The release of a new film has sparked a wave of commentary from the press and family lawyers alike. It shows that bloody mindedness and divorce are a timeless combination. Contains spoilers!