Sorrell v Sorrell [2005] EWHC 1717 (Fam)
Judgment date: 29 July 2005
Related
Special Contributions: ‘Genius’, Guesswork and Gender Discrimination
This article revisits the contested terrain of ‘special contribution’, and questions whether it retains any legitimate role in contemporary financial remedy jurisprudence. It argues that the concept is both theoretically discriminatory and practically uncertain.
SS v IS [2023] EWHC 1544 (Fam)
Judgment date: 14 June 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/1544
Roberts J. Final hearing in financial remedy proceedings with issues around spousal maintenance, offshore trusts and non-matrimonial assets.
Background
The parties met as students in 2003 in Russia and married in 2004. They had essentially no
DR v UG [2023] EWFC 68
Judgment date: 05 April 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2023/68
Moor J. The parties were Danish. H was aged 57 and W aged 49. Children aged 18, 16, and 16. Married 2004, marriage broke down in 2019.
H was CEO of a drugs manufacturer but staged a
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 3 | Winter
Related
Special Contributions: ‘Genius’, Guesswork and Gender Discrimination
This article revisits the contested terrain of ‘special contribution’, and questions whether it retains any legitimate role in contemporary financial remedy jurisprudence. It argues that the concept is both theoretically discriminatory and practically uncertain.
SS v IS [2023] EWHC 1544 (Fam)
Judgment date: 14 June 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/1544
Roberts J. Final hearing in financial remedy proceedings with issues around spousal maintenance, offshore trusts and non-matrimonial assets.
Background
The parties met as students in 2003 in Russia and married in 2004. They had essentially no
DR v UG [2023] EWFC 68
Judgment date: 05 April 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2023/68
Moor J. The parties were Danish. H was aged 57 and W aged 49. Children aged 18, 16, and 16. Married 2004, marriage broke down in 2019.
H was CEO of a drugs manufacturer but staged a
Latest
Delaying Departure? Domicile in Divorce Cases
[2026] 1 FRJ 16. In Ramana v Kist Ramana [2025] EWCA Civ 1022, [2025] 4 WLR 120 the Court of Appeal was concerned with the question of how a domicile of choice may be lost. This article explores the arguments made at the hearing, the court’s decision and reasoning, and the likely implications.
Stop! In the Name of the LSA: Why Your Favourite Legal Exec Can’t Touch That Form A after Mazur and XX v GH
HHJ Farquhar was confronted with the practical consequences of Mazur for family law cases. The issue arose when Family Law Partners, a highly respected specialist family law firm, sought an exemption permitting their senior Chartered Legal Executive, Ms Lisa Burton Durham, to conduct litigation.
Book Review: Financial Remedies Handbook 2025
[2026] 1 FRJ 74. Rhys Taylor reviews the 15th edition of Financial Remedies Handbook 2026, by District Judge Sophie Harrison, published by LexisNexis, and says every financial remedy lawyer should have it by their side.