Shaw v Shaw [2002] 2 FLR 1204, CA
Judgment date: 31 July 2002
Related
GH v H [2024] EWHC 2869 (Fam)
Judgment date: 12 November 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/2869
Mr Simon Colton KC sitting as a deputy High Court judge.
Summary
On W’s application, an interim changing order was made final in respect of sums to be paid to a third party/child of
TW v GC [2024] EWHC 949 (Fam)
Judgment date: 21 February 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/949
This was an appeal of a final order in financial remedy proceedings heard by Mr Justice Cusworth. The appeal argued that HHJ Furness KC at first instance had pitched W’s needs at too high a
D v D [2024] EWFC 76
Judgment date: 12 March 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/76
HHJ Booth, sitting as a judge of the High Court: 25:75 division in favour of H following breakdown of second marriage and H’s substantial assets. Court considered W’s needs should be generously interpreted to
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 2 | Summer
Related
GH v H [2024] EWHC 2869 (Fam)
Judgment date: 12 November 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/2869
Mr Simon Colton KC sitting as a deputy High Court judge.
Summary
On W’s application, an interim changing order was made final in respect of sums to be paid to a third party/child of
TW v GC [2024] EWHC 949 (Fam)
Judgment date: 21 February 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/949
This was an appeal of a final order in financial remedy proceedings heard by Mr Justice Cusworth. The appeal argued that HHJ Furness KC at first instance had pitched W’s needs at too high a
D v D [2024] EWFC 76
Judgment date: 12 March 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/76
HHJ Booth, sitting as a judge of the High Court: 25:75 division in favour of H following breakdown of second marriage and H’s substantial assets. Court considered W’s needs should be generously interpreted to
Latest
The Myth of a General Equitable Jurisdiction to Reconsider Financial Remedy Orders
If the Thwaite jurisdiction exists, the doctrine should only need to be invoked in exceptionally rare cases. Ordinarily, careful drafting of a non-variable property adjustment order should provide for future contingencies, however remote or unlikely.
In Memory of Matthew Brunsdon-Tully, 3.6.1984 – 31.3.2026
[2026] 2 FRJ 163. Matthew Brunsdon-Tully left us too soon, aged only 41. But people will remember a truly remarkable human being: a first-class lawyer and a proud Welshman and cricketer, with an infectious sense of humour, a contagious laugh and a brilliant, albeit restless, mind.
Private FDRs Under the Spotlight
Are private FDRs working? And does the answer depend upon who is answering? Those were the core questions discussed at a gathering of family lawyers – both neutral evaluators and advisers – in central London on 9 June 2026.