Shaw v Shaw [2002] 2 FLR 1204, CA

Judgment date: 31 July 2002

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2002/1298.html

Related

GH v H [2024] EWHC 2869 (Fam)

Judgment date: 12 November 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/2869 Mr Simon Colton KC sitting as a deputy High Court judge. Summary On W’s application, an interim changing order was made final in respect of sums to be paid to a third party/child of

TW v GC [2024] EWHC 949 (Fam)

Judgment date: 21 February 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/949 This was an appeal of a final order in financial remedy proceedings heard by Mr Justice Cusworth. The appeal argued that HHJ Furness KC at first instance had pitched W’s needs at too high a

D v D [2024] EWFC 76

Judgment date: 12 March 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/76 HHJ Booth, sitting as a judge of the High Court: 25:75 division in favour of H following breakdown of second marriage and H’s substantial assets. Court considered W’s needs should be generously interpreted to

Read the journal

Related

GH v H [2024] EWHC 2869 (Fam)

Judgment date: 12 November 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/2869 Mr Simon Colton KC sitting as a deputy High Court judge. Summary On W’s application, an interim changing order was made final in respect of sums to be paid to a third party/child of

TW v GC [2024] EWHC 949 (Fam)

Judgment date: 21 February 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/949 This was an appeal of a final order in financial remedy proceedings heard by Mr Justice Cusworth. The appeal argued that HHJ Furness KC at first instance had pitched W’s needs at too high a

D v D [2024] EWFC 76

Judgment date: 12 March 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/76 HHJ Booth, sitting as a judge of the High Court: 25:75 division in favour of H following breakdown of second marriage and H’s substantial assets. Court considered W’s needs should be generously interpreted to

Latest

Portals: Bringing It All Together

Portals: Bringing It All Together

Tips and tricks on using the digital court portals from a member of the stakeholder group for the profession, including how to avoid the double login, when to denote documents as confidential, and how to prompt a response from the court.

FRJ – ‘Well, He (or She) Didn’t Ask!’ – the Impact of Non-Disclosure When the Question Isn’t Asked

FRJ – ‘Well, He (or She) Didn’t Ask!’ – the Impact of Non-Disclosure When the Question Isn’t Asked

Is it a shield to non-disclosure by one party during financial remedy proceedings if the other party could (and perhaps should) have asked? The duty on parties to give full and frank financial disclosure is not merely a private obligation between them; it is a duty to the court.

The Reluctant Pension Credit Member

The Reluctant Pension Credit Member

[2026] 1 FRJ 39. In the case of AP v TP [2025] EWFC 190 (B) a financial remedy order was made by consent, following an FDR, which included a pension sharing order in W’s favour. Difficulties began when W failed to provide the necessary information to permit the pension share to be implemented.

is curated by

The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software

EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS