Shaw v Shaw [2002] 2 FLR 1204, CA

Judgment date: 12 November 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/2869 Mr Simon Colton KC sitting as a deputy High Court judge. Summary On W’s application, an interim changing order was made final in respect of sums to be paid to a third party/child of

Judgment date: 21 February 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/949 This was an appeal of a final order in financial remedy proceedings heard by Mr Justice Cusworth. The appeal argued that HHJ Furness KC at first instance had pitched W’s needs at too high a

Judgment date: 12 March 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/76 HHJ Booth, sitting as a judge of the High Court: 25:75 division in favour of H following breakdown of second marriage and H’s substantial assets. Court considered W’s needs should be generously interpreted to

[2026] 1 FRJ 39. In the case of AP v TP [2025] EWFC 190 (B) a financial remedy order was made by consent, following an FDR, which included a pension sharing order in W’s favour. Difficulties began when W failed to provide the necessary information to permit the pension share to be implemented.