Shaw v Shaw [2002] 2 FLR 1204, CA
Judgment date: 31 July 2002
Related
GH v H [2024] EWHC 2869 (Fam)
Judgment date: 12 November 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/2869
Mr Simon Colton KC sitting as a deputy High Court judge.
Summary
On W’s application, an interim changing order was made final in respect of sums to be paid to a third party/child of
TW v GC [2024] EWHC 949 (Fam)
Judgment date: 21 February 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/949
This was an appeal of a final order in financial remedy proceedings heard by Mr Justice Cusworth. The appeal argued that HHJ Furness KC at first instance had pitched W’s needs at too high a
D v D [2024] EWFC 76
Judgment date: 12 March 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/76
HHJ Booth, sitting as a judge of the High Court: 25:75 division in favour of H following breakdown of second marriage and H’s substantial assets. Court considered W’s needs should be generously interpreted to
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 3 | Winter
Related
GH v H [2024] EWHC 2869 (Fam)
Judgment date: 12 November 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/2869
Mr Simon Colton KC sitting as a deputy High Court judge.
Summary
On W’s application, an interim changing order was made final in respect of sums to be paid to a third party/child of
TW v GC [2024] EWHC 949 (Fam)
Judgment date: 21 February 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/949
This was an appeal of a final order in financial remedy proceedings heard by Mr Justice Cusworth. The appeal argued that HHJ Furness KC at first instance had pitched W’s needs at too high a
D v D [2024] EWFC 76
Judgment date: 12 March 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/76
HHJ Booth, sitting as a judge of the High Court: 25:75 division in favour of H following breakdown of second marriage and H’s substantial assets. Court considered W’s needs should be generously interpreted to
Latest
An End to Secrecy in Family Courts? Proposed Reforms of Contempt of Court Law That Could Lift the Threats to Sharing Information
It’s common knowledge that people involved in family court proceedings held in private are very restricted in what they can say about what’s happening. The confusing part is when someone might be in contempt of court just for talking or writing about their case, even when anonymised.
The Absent Owner – Varying Beneficial Interests Upon Separation: an Analysis of the Leading Cases
Considering TLATA cases where A and B are joint owners of a family home, the relationship breaks down, and A vacates leaving B in occupation and financially responsible for the property, and then A returns years later seeking their share of the net equity.
When Might an Arbitration Not Be Entirely Private and Confidential?
One of the great virtues of family law arbitration is its ability to provide the parties with confidentiality and privacy for their dispute. Unlike court proceedings, the parties will not face the risk of the hearing taking place in open court with curious members of the public present.