Refusal of Application for Stay of Divorce Petition [2025] EWFC 377 (B)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/377
Her Honour Judge Cope
Related
Bartok v Brunner [2026] EWFC 146
Judgment date: 13 May 2026
McKendrick J. A hearing dealing with two distinct matters: a contested divorce application, and disputed applications for financial remedies, including forum conveniens issues, and successful applications for a Hadkinson order and Hemain injunction.
JQ v IQ [2025] EWFC 192 (B)
Judgment date: 23 June 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/192
HHJ Vincent. A Pakistani divorce was deemed to be valid in the UK on public policy grounds and permission was granted for the wife to bring financial remedies proceedings in this jurisdiction.
This hearing concerned the
Ogbedo v Oghenerume-Taiga [2024] EWHC 3193 (Fam)
Judgment date: 12 December 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/3193
Sir Jonathan Cohen. This is a successful application of NO (herein referred to as ‘F’) to strike out MT’s (herein referred to as ‘M’) application for nullity pursuant to FPR 4.4 on the basis
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 2 | Summer
Related
Bartok v Brunner [2026] EWFC 146
Judgment date: 13 May 2026
McKendrick J. A hearing dealing with two distinct matters: a contested divorce application, and disputed applications for financial remedies, including forum conveniens issues, and successful applications for a Hadkinson order and Hemain injunction.
JQ v IQ [2025] EWFC 192 (B)
Judgment date: 23 June 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/192
HHJ Vincent. A Pakistani divorce was deemed to be valid in the UK on public policy grounds and permission was granted for the wife to bring financial remedies proceedings in this jurisdiction.
This hearing concerned the
Ogbedo v Oghenerume-Taiga [2024] EWHC 3193 (Fam)
Judgment date: 12 December 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/3193
Sir Jonathan Cohen. This is a successful application of NO (herein referred to as ‘F’) to strike out MT’s (herein referred to as ‘M’) application for nullity pursuant to FPR 4.4 on the basis
Latest
Tech Corner: Only 11%. What Technology Can Do About the Pensions Gap on Divorce
[2026] 3 FRJ 266. Only 11% of divorcees with a pension not yet in payment made any arrangement to share it, according to the Fair Shares study, which also found that over a third of divorcees did not know the value of their own pension. Ignoring the pensions is not an option.
Costs in Financial Remedy Proceedings: Time for Greater Discipline?
[2026] 3 FRJ 206. If costs discipline is to be meaningful, parties must understand from the outset that disproportionate litigation expenditure will ultimately remain their own responsibility even in a needs case. Money spent on costs is money removed from the resources available to the family.
IFoA Working Party for Pensions on Divorce: Full Resources Now Published
Building on the work of the Pensions Advisory Group and the IFoA thematic review of work by actuary PODEs, an IFoA working party has published essential new materials to further develop good practice in this area. Family lawyers should look for, and request, PODE adoption of these materials.