Cases Agreements Conduct Compensation Principle Needs Open in Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42, [2010] 2 FLR 1900 Judgment date: 20 October 2010https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2010/42.html Related A v Z [2026] EWHC 654 (Fam) Trowell J. Final hearing in a high net worth financial remedies case concerning the effect of a prenuptial agreement on shares transferred to the husband in companies forming part of the wife’s family business group during the marriage. KMR v AER [2026] EWFC 10 (B) DDJ Benjamin Rose. Judgment considering high-value assets, non-disclosure, jurisdictional questions, issues surrounding the validity of a nuptial settlement and general conduct of proceedings. Varsha Bhadresh Gohil v Bhadresh Babulal Gohil & Ors [2025] EWHC 3646 (Fam) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2025/3646?query=%5B2025%5D+EWHC+3646+%28Fam%29 Read the journal Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring Open in Related A v Z [2026] EWHC 654 (Fam) Trowell J. Final hearing in a high net worth financial remedies case concerning the effect of a prenuptial agreement on shares transferred to the husband in companies forming part of the wife’s family business group during the marriage. KMR v AER [2026] EWFC 10 (B) DDJ Benjamin Rose. Judgment considering high-value assets, non-disclosure, jurisdictional questions, issues surrounding the validity of a nuptial settlement and general conduct of proceedings. Varsha Bhadresh Gohil v Bhadresh Babulal Gohil & Ors [2025] EWHC 3646 (Fam) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2025/3646?query=%5B2025%5D+EWHC+3646+%28Fam%29 Latest How are family lawyers really approaching legal research and technology? Class Legal is reviewing its products, resources, and customer behaviour to better understand what practitioners need. Interview with Richard Sax On 11 February 2026 there was a celebratory lunch with the past recipients of Resolution’s John Cornwell Lifetime Achievement Award, organised by David Emmerson, who here interviews Richard Sax. The Curious Case of CA 1989 Schedule 1 paragraph 2(3) Paragraph 1 of CA 1989 Schedule 1 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief against parents’. Paragraph 2 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief for persons over eighteen’. As recent cases have demonstrated this structure causes complications. is curated by The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS
A v Z [2026] EWHC 654 (Fam) Trowell J. Final hearing in a high net worth financial remedies case concerning the effect of a prenuptial agreement on shares transferred to the husband in companies forming part of the wife’s family business group during the marriage.
KMR v AER [2026] EWFC 10 (B) DDJ Benjamin Rose. Judgment considering high-value assets, non-disclosure, jurisdictional questions, issues surrounding the validity of a nuptial settlement and general conduct of proceedings.
Varsha Bhadresh Gohil v Bhadresh Babulal Gohil & Ors [2025] EWHC 3646 (Fam) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2025/3646?query=%5B2025%5D+EWHC+3646+%28Fam%29
A v Z [2026] EWHC 654 (Fam) Trowell J. Final hearing in a high net worth financial remedies case concerning the effect of a prenuptial agreement on shares transferred to the husband in companies forming part of the wife’s family business group during the marriage.
KMR v AER [2026] EWFC 10 (B) DDJ Benjamin Rose. Judgment considering high-value assets, non-disclosure, jurisdictional questions, issues surrounding the validity of a nuptial settlement and general conduct of proceedings.
Varsha Bhadresh Gohil v Bhadresh Babulal Gohil & Ors [2025] EWHC 3646 (Fam) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2025/3646?query=%5B2025%5D+EWHC+3646+%28Fam%29
How are family lawyers really approaching legal research and technology? Class Legal is reviewing its products, resources, and customer behaviour to better understand what practitioners need.
Interview with Richard Sax On 11 February 2026 there was a celebratory lunch with the past recipients of Resolution’s John Cornwell Lifetime Achievement Award, organised by David Emmerson, who here interviews Richard Sax.
The Curious Case of CA 1989 Schedule 1 paragraph 2(3) Paragraph 1 of CA 1989 Schedule 1 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief against parents’. Paragraph 2 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief for persons over eighteen’. As recent cases have demonstrated this structure causes complications.