R v R [2021] EWHC 195 (Fam)
Judgment date: 21 January 2021
Related
AT v NB (Maintenance Pending Suit) [2025] EWFC 248 (B)
DDJ Mark Harrop. Judgment on wife's application for interim maintenance.
SM v BA (No 2: Maintenance Pending Suit) [2025] EWFC 28
Judgment date: 19 February 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/28
Nicholas Allen KC, sitting as a deputy High Court judge. Application to increase maintenance pending suit (MPS) in ‘super-rich’ financial remedies case.
Overview
This judgment follows that in SM v BA (Legal Services Payment Order) [2025] EWFC
DSD v MJW (Costs of MPS) [2025] EWFC 119 (B)
Judgment date: 24 April 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/119
DDJ David Hodson. Proportionality and maintenance pending suit (MPS), a cautionary tale. In this case the DDJ concluded that the game was very much not worth the candle, and the application turned out to be very
Read the journal


Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 2 | Summer
Related
AT v NB (Maintenance Pending Suit) [2025] EWFC 248 (B)
DDJ Mark Harrop. Judgment on wife's application for interim maintenance.
SM v BA (No 2: Maintenance Pending Suit) [2025] EWFC 28
Judgment date: 19 February 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/28
Nicholas Allen KC, sitting as a deputy High Court judge. Application to increase maintenance pending suit (MPS) in ‘super-rich’ financial remedies case.
Overview
This judgment follows that in SM v BA (Legal Services Payment Order) [2025] EWFC
DSD v MJW (Costs of MPS) [2025] EWFC 119 (B)
Judgment date: 24 April 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/119
DDJ David Hodson. Proportionality and maintenance pending suit (MPS), a cautionary tale. In this case the DDJ concluded that the game was very much not worth the candle, and the application turned out to be very
Latest

Open Justice in the Modern Age
A guest lecture delivered on Tuesday, 7 October 2025, at 6pm, at George Town, Grand Cayman.

Applied Theatre and the Advocacy Gap in Financial Remedies
Closing the gap between legal recognition and judicial persuasion.

War (of the Roses) – What Is It Good For?
The release of a new film has sparked a wave of commentary from the press and family lawyers alike. It shows that bloody mindedness and divorce are a timeless combination. Contains spoilers!