R v R [2021] EWHC 195 (Fam)
Judgment date: 21 January 2021
Related
AT v NB (No 2) (Maintenance Pending Suit: Costs) [2025] EWFC 287 (B)
DDJ Mark Harrop. Judgment regarding costs arising out of an application for maintenance pending suit.
AT v NB (Maintenance Pending Suit) [2025] EWFC 248 (B)
DDJ Mark Harrop. Judgment on wife's application for interim maintenance.
SM v BA (No 2: Maintenance Pending Suit) [2025] EWFC 28
Judgment date: 19 February 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/28
Nicholas Allen KC, sitting as a deputy High Court judge. Application to increase maintenance pending suit (MPS) in ‘super-rich’ financial remedies case.
Overview
This judgment follows that in SM v BA (Legal Services Payment Order) [2025] EWFC
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 3 | Winter
Related
AT v NB (No 2) (Maintenance Pending Suit: Costs) [2025] EWFC 287 (B)
DDJ Mark Harrop. Judgment regarding costs arising out of an application for maintenance pending suit.
AT v NB (Maintenance Pending Suit) [2025] EWFC 248 (B)
DDJ Mark Harrop. Judgment on wife's application for interim maintenance.
SM v BA (No 2: Maintenance Pending Suit) [2025] EWFC 28
Judgment date: 19 February 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/28
Nicholas Allen KC, sitting as a deputy High Court judge. Application to increase maintenance pending suit (MPS) in ‘super-rich’ financial remedies case.
Overview
This judgment follows that in SM v BA (Legal Services Payment Order) [2025] EWFC
Latest
Sir James Munby: an Obituary
Sir Nicholas Mostyn writes about the life of Sir James Munby, who died on 1 January 2026: "a great leader, a brilliant historian, a remarkable lawyer, and a superb writer".
PD 27A Redux: March 2026 Family Court Bundle Changes Primer
The President has promulgated a revised PD 27A which will come into force on 2 March 2026, designed to modernise the law and embed best practice into one chaptered Practice Direction. This article sets out the key changes practitioners and litigants should be aware of in family proceedings.
An End to Secrecy in Family Courts? Proposed Reforms of Contempt of Court Law That Could Lift the Threats to Sharing Information
It’s common knowledge that people involved in family court proceedings held in private are very restricted in what they can say about what’s happening. The confusing part is when someone might be in contempt of court just for talking or writing about their case, even when anonymised.