R (Steinfeld and Keidan) v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32

Judgment date: 27 June 2018

http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2018/32.html

Related

FC v WC [2024] EWFC 291

Judgment date: 21 October 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/291 HHJ Vincent sitting as a s 9 Deputy High Court Judge. The parties, who are British nationals, entered a French form of civil partnership, a ‘PACS’, when living in France. They returned to live in England in

N v J [2024] EWFC 184

Judgment date: 15 July 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/184 Peel J’s view is that it is unlikely that domestic abuse would have a material impact on the vast majority of financial remedy cases, such that it would need to be litigated. Peel J uses the

Lawrence v Gallagher [2012] EWCA Civ 394, [2012] 2 FLR 643

Judgment date: 29 March 2012 http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2012/394.html

Read the journal

Related

FC v WC [2024] EWFC 291

Judgment date: 21 October 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/291 HHJ Vincent sitting as a s 9 Deputy High Court Judge. The parties, who are British nationals, entered a French form of civil partnership, a ‘PACS’, when living in France. They returned to live in England in

N v J [2024] EWFC 184

Judgment date: 15 July 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/184 Peel J’s view is that it is unlikely that domestic abuse would have a material impact on the vast majority of financial remedy cases, such that it would need to be litigated. Peel J uses the

Lawrence v Gallagher [2012] EWCA Civ 394, [2012] 2 FLR 643

Judgment date: 29 March 2012 http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2012/394.html

Latest

Portals: Bringing It All Together

Portals: Bringing It All Together

Tips and tricks on using the digital court portals from a member of the stakeholder group for the profession, including how to avoid the double login, when to denote documents as confidential, and how to prompt a response from the court.

FRJ – ‘Well, He (or She) Didn’t Ask!’ – the Impact of Non-Disclosure When the Question Isn’t Asked

FRJ – ‘Well, He (or She) Didn’t Ask!’ – the Impact of Non-Disclosure When the Question Isn’t Asked

Is it a shield to non-disclosure by one party during financial remedy proceedings if the other party could (and perhaps should) have asked? The duty on parties to give full and frank financial disclosure is not merely a private obligation between them; it is a duty to the court.

The Reluctant Pension Credit Member

The Reluctant Pension Credit Member

[2026] 1 FRJ 39. In the case of AP v TP [2025] EWFC 190 (B) a financial remedy order was made by consent, following an FDR, which included a pension sharing order in W’s favour. Difficulties began when W failed to provide the necessary information to permit the pension share to be implemented.

is curated by

The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software

EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS