Quan v Bray [2014] EWHC 3340 (Fam)
Judgment date: 27 October 2014
Related
HO v TL [2023] EWFC 215
Judgment date: 01 December 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2023/215
Peel J. Final hearing. Guidance on factors relevant to valuing a private company; accessibility of extricating money from trusts per Charman; and extent of matrimonialisation of H’s extra-marital financial contributions.
H aged 49. W aged 56
EK v DK & Ors [2023] EWHC 1829 (Fam)
Judgment date: 11 May 2023
https://assets.caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/1829/ewhc_fam_2023_1829.pdf
Mr Justice Francis. Application by W to set aside consent order dated March 2018 on basis of H’s non-disclosure.
This was a long marriage with three teenage/young adult
Rose v Rose & Ors [2022] EWFC 192
Judgment date: 25 November 2022
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2022/192.html
His Honour Judge Booth (sitting as a Judge of the High Court pursuant to s 9 SCA 1981).
How should the court ‘deal with a respondent husband who has been dishonest throughout, has failed
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 2 | Summer
Related
HO v TL [2023] EWFC 215
Judgment date: 01 December 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2023/215
Peel J. Final hearing. Guidance on factors relevant to valuing a private company; accessibility of extricating money from trusts per Charman; and extent of matrimonialisation of H’s extra-marital financial contributions.
H aged 49. W aged 56
EK v DK & Ors [2023] EWHC 1829 (Fam)
Judgment date: 11 May 2023
https://assets.caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/1829/ewhc_fam_2023_1829.pdf
Mr Justice Francis. Application by W to set aside consent order dated March 2018 on basis of H’s non-disclosure.
This was a long marriage with three teenage/young adult
Rose v Rose & Ors [2022] EWFC 192
Judgment date: 25 November 2022
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2022/192.html
His Honour Judge Booth (sitting as a Judge of the High Court pursuant to s 9 SCA 1981).
How should the court ‘deal with a respondent husband who has been dishonest throughout, has failed
Latest
My Time on the Family Procedure Rule Committee
The Vice Chair of the FRJ Editorial Board talks about his six years as a barrister member of the Family Procedure Rule Committee.
Intervenor Cases: Preliminary Issue Hearing or FDR (or NCDR)?
Should case management decisions in intervenor cases place greater focus on the opportunities presented by an FDR or NCDR taking place prior to a preliminary issue hearing?
Standish One Year On – Is There Agreement As to What It Means?
The question of whether property that is matrimonial property has as a consequence to be shared equally has become one of the main areas of debate in the first instance decisions over the last year.