Sonal Kanabar v Dipak Maganal Kanabar (Deceased) & Anor [2026] EWCA Civ 582 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2026/582
A v Z [2026] EWHC 654 (Fam) Trowell J. Final hearing in a high net worth financial remedies case concerning the effect of a prenuptial agreement on shares transferred to the husband in companies forming part of the wife’s family business group during the marriage.
KMR v AER [2026] EWFC 10 (B) DDJ Benjamin Rose. Judgment considering high-value assets, non-disclosure, jurisdictional questions, issues surrounding the validity of a nuptial settlement and general conduct of proceedings.
K v K [2026] EWFC 83 (B) DJ Parker’s decision emphasises the importance of the court transcript where there is a dispute as to what was said by the judge. Ultimately H’s application to set aside a final order by consent failed because H was wrong; the FDR judge had not given him a 28-day cooling off period.
AGS v RKS [2026] EWFC 104 (B) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/104?query=AGS+RKS+%5B2026%5D+EWFC+104+%28B%29#download-options
FG v BN (Appeal Out of Time) [2026] EWFC 101 (B) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/101?query=FG+BN+%28Appeal+Out+Time%29+%5B2026%5D+EWFC+101+%28B%29
Chloe Wilson Chloe is a family specialist pupil barrister at St John’s Chambers, accepting instructions across the breadth of family law and at all stages, with a particular interest in matrimonial finance and private child proceedings.
Varsha Bhadresh Gohil v Bhadresh Babulal Gohil & Ors [2025] EWHC 3646 (Fam) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2025/3646?query=%5B2025%5D+EWHC+3646+%28Fam%29
The Curious Case of CA 1989 Schedule 1 paragraph 2(3) Paragraph 1 of CA 1989 Schedule 1 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief against parents’. Paragraph 2 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief for persons over eighteen’. As recent cases have demonstrated this structure causes complications.
Potanina v Potanin (Case Management) [2026] EWFC 80 MacDonald J. Case management decision on the wife's claim under Part III Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 after a Russian divorce. The court refused the husband's applications to adjourn proceedings and for a split hearing, lifted a stay on disclosure, and set directions.
A and Z (No 2) (Interim Third Party Debt Order), Re [2026] EWFC 90 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2026/90?query=A+Z+%28No+2%29+%28Interim+Third+Party+Debt+Order%29%2C+Re+%5B2026%5D+EWFC+90
Reid-Roberts & Anor v Mei-Lin & Anor [2026] EWHC 49 (Ch) Cawson J. Appeal and cross-appeal concerning H’s beneficial interest in the matrimonial home. Cawson J found that H had not transferred his beneficial interest to W, but that sale of the property should be deferred.
KMR v AER [2026] EWFC 10 (B) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/10?query=KMR+AER+%5B2026%5D+EWFC+10+%28B%29
Ferrucio Ferrara v Caroline Frances Ferrara [2026] EWCA Civ 512 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2026/512?query=Ferrucio+Ferrara+Caroline+Frances+Ferrara+%5B2026%5D+EWCA+Civ+512