FRC Corner Delete Standard Family Orders: Children Open in Order 7.0: Private Law Case Management Directions and Orders Precedent Library Order_7.0_-_Private_Law_Case_Management_Directions_and_Orders_Precedent_Library_Order[1]order_7.0_-_private_law_case_management_directions_and_orders_precedent_library_order1.docx248 KBdownload-circle Related Order 23.1: Child Deprivation of Liberty Order Order_23.1_-_Child_Deprivation_of_Liberty_Order[1]order_23.1_-_child_deprivation_of_liberty_order1.docx52 KBdownload-circle Order 22.4: Arbitration Challenge Order Order_22.4_-_Arbitration_Challenge_Order[1]order_22.4_-_arbitration_challenge_order1.docx31 KBdownload-circle Order 22.1: Stay Pursuant to Arbitration Act 1996 s 9 and/or under the Court's Case Management Powers Order_22.1_-_Stay_Pursuant_to_Arbitration_Act_1996_s_9_&_or_Court's_Case_Management_Powers[1]order_22.1_-_stay_pursuant_to_arbitration_act_1996_s_9_and_or_courts_case_management_powers1.doc82 KBdownload-circle Read the journal Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring Open in Related Order 23.1: Child Deprivation of Liberty Order Order_23.1_-_Child_Deprivation_of_Liberty_Order[1]order_23.1_-_child_deprivation_of_liberty_order1.docx52 KBdownload-circle Order 22.4: Arbitration Challenge Order Order_22.4_-_Arbitration_Challenge_Order[1]order_22.4_-_arbitration_challenge_order1.docx31 KBdownload-circle Order 22.1: Stay Pursuant to Arbitration Act 1996 s 9 and/or under the Court's Case Management Powers Order_22.1_-_Stay_Pursuant_to_Arbitration_Act_1996_s_9_&_or_Court's_Case_Management_Powers[1]order_22.1_-_stay_pursuant_to_arbitration_act_1996_s_9_and_or_courts_case_management_powers1.doc82 KBdownload-circle Latest A Fairer End? Gaps in the Government’s Nuptial Agreement Proposals On 5 June 2026, the Government published A Fairer End to Relationships, proposing comprehensive reform of the financial consequences of both divorce and separation for unmarried couples. This piece focuses on the Government’s plan to introduce binding qualifying nuptial agreements (QNAs). 50 Years on from Martin v Martin 1976 – Are Add-backs Fit for Purpose? [2026] 2 FRJ 94. Add-backs were a useful mechanism to prevent one party’s unilateral dissipation of assets which unfairly prejudiced the non-dissipating spouse’s share. But something has gone wrong when the outcomes deviate too far from what the average person considers fair. Maybe Compensation Isn’t What You Think [2026] 2 FRJ 118. The compensation principle set out in Miller; McFarlane is the logical next step in ending discrimination between different but equal contributions. Compensation is a vehicle to alleviate post-divorce disparity, to give both spouses an equal start on the road to independent living. is curated by The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS
Order 23.1: Child Deprivation of Liberty Order Order_23.1_-_Child_Deprivation_of_Liberty_Order[1]order_23.1_-_child_deprivation_of_liberty_order1.docx52 KBdownload-circle
Order 22.4: Arbitration Challenge Order Order_22.4_-_Arbitration_Challenge_Order[1]order_22.4_-_arbitration_challenge_order1.docx31 KBdownload-circle
Order 22.1: Stay Pursuant to Arbitration Act 1996 s 9 and/or under the Court's Case Management Powers Order_22.1_-_Stay_Pursuant_to_Arbitration_Act_1996_s_9_&_or_Court's_Case_Management_Powers[1]order_22.1_-_stay_pursuant_to_arbitration_act_1996_s_9_and_or_courts_case_management_powers1.doc82 KBdownload-circle
Order 23.1: Child Deprivation of Liberty Order Order_23.1_-_Child_Deprivation_of_Liberty_Order[1]order_23.1_-_child_deprivation_of_liberty_order1.docx52 KBdownload-circle
Order 22.4: Arbitration Challenge Order Order_22.4_-_Arbitration_Challenge_Order[1]order_22.4_-_arbitration_challenge_order1.docx31 KBdownload-circle
Order 22.1: Stay Pursuant to Arbitration Act 1996 s 9 and/or under the Court's Case Management Powers Order_22.1_-_Stay_Pursuant_to_Arbitration_Act_1996_s_9_&_or_Court's_Case_Management_Powers[1]order_22.1_-_stay_pursuant_to_arbitration_act_1996_s_9_and_or_courts_case_management_powers1.doc82 KBdownload-circle
A Fairer End? Gaps in the Government’s Nuptial Agreement Proposals On 5 June 2026, the Government published A Fairer End to Relationships, proposing comprehensive reform of the financial consequences of both divorce and separation for unmarried couples. This piece focuses on the Government’s plan to introduce binding qualifying nuptial agreements (QNAs).
50 Years on from Martin v Martin 1976 – Are Add-backs Fit for Purpose? [2026] 2 FRJ 94. Add-backs were a useful mechanism to prevent one party’s unilateral dissipation of assets which unfairly prejudiced the non-dissipating spouse’s share. But something has gone wrong when the outcomes deviate too far from what the average person considers fair.
Maybe Compensation Isn’t What You Think [2026] 2 FRJ 118. The compensation principle set out in Miller; McFarlane is the logical next step in ending discrimination between different but equal contributions. Compensation is a vehicle to alleviate post-divorce disparity, to give both spouses an equal start on the road to independent living.