Notes on the Revised ES2 Template
Related
ES2 template - July 2025
ES2-July-2025es2-july-2025.xlsx25 KBdownload-circle
Form PPF1: Pension Protection Fund (PPF) - Sharing annex to a Pension Compensation Sharing Order [section 24E of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973] [paragraph 19A of Schedule 5 to the Civil Partnership Act 2004]
form-ppf1-engform-ppf1-eng.docx32 KBdownload-circle
Form P1: Pension sharing annex under [section 24B of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973] [paragraph 15 of Schedule 5 to the Civil Partnership Act 2004]
form-p1-engform-p1-eng.docx33 KBdownload-circle
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 3 | Winter
Related
ES2 template - July 2025
ES2-July-2025es2-july-2025.xlsx25 KBdownload-circle
Form PPF1: Pension Protection Fund (PPF) - Sharing annex to a Pension Compensation Sharing Order [section 24E of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973] [paragraph 19A of Schedule 5 to the Civil Partnership Act 2004]
form-ppf1-engform-ppf1-eng.docx32 KBdownload-circle
Form P1: Pension sharing annex under [section 24B of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973] [paragraph 15 of Schedule 5 to the Civil Partnership Act 2004]
form-p1-engform-p1-eng.docx33 KBdownload-circle
Latest
The Reluctant Pension Credit Member
[2026] 1 FRJ 39. In the case of AP v TP [2025] EWFC 190 (B) a financial remedy order was made by consent, following an FDR, which included a pension sharing order in W’s favour. Difficulties began when W failed to provide the necessary information to permit the pension share to be implemented.
Piercing Trust Structures in Switzerland in Aid of Financial Claims in England
[2026] 1 FRJ 26. Swiss courts possess domestic tools to pierce through foreign trust structures and make orders in respect of their underlying assets. This article examines what those tools are and how they may be deployed in aid of financial remedies proceedings in England.
Delaying Departure? Domicile in Divorce Cases
[2026] 1 FRJ 16. In Ramana v Kist Ramana [2025] EWCA Civ 1022, [2025] 4 WLR 120 the Court of Appeal was concerned with the question of how a domicile of choice may be lost. This article explores the arguments made at the hearing, the court’s decision and reasoning, and the likely implications.