Cases Add-Backs Open in Norris v Norris [2002] EWHC 2996 (Fam) Judgment date: 28 November 2002http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2002/2996.html Related KMR v AER [2026] EWFC 10 (B) DDJ Benjamin Rose. Judgment considering high-value assets, non-disclosure, jurisdictional questions, issues surrounding the validity of a nuptial settlement and general conduct of proceedings. All Change or More of the Same? Housing Needs and Notional Property Down Under in light of Amendments to the Family Law Act 1975 [2026] 1 FRJ 55. Considering two aspects of the 2025 amendments to the Australian Family Law Act 1975: the greater recognition given to the needs of a party who has the care of a child to provide housing, and the removal of notional property or addbacks in the balance sheet in property division. BY v GC (No 2) [2025] EWFC 397 In this seven-day final hearing of a long marriage with adult children, the computation and distribution of a variety of assets were determined by a robust analysis and application of the case law by Mr Nicholas Allen KC. Read the journal Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring Open in Related KMR v AER [2026] EWFC 10 (B) DDJ Benjamin Rose. Judgment considering high-value assets, non-disclosure, jurisdictional questions, issues surrounding the validity of a nuptial settlement and general conduct of proceedings. All Change or More of the Same? Housing Needs and Notional Property Down Under in light of Amendments to the Family Law Act 1975 [2026] 1 FRJ 55. Considering two aspects of the 2025 amendments to the Australian Family Law Act 1975: the greater recognition given to the needs of a party who has the care of a child to provide housing, and the removal of notional property or addbacks in the balance sheet in property division. BY v GC (No 2) [2025] EWFC 397 In this seven-day final hearing of a long marriage with adult children, the computation and distribution of a variety of assets were determined by a robust analysis and application of the case law by Mr Nicholas Allen KC. Latest How are family lawyers really approaching legal research and technology? Class Legal is reviewing its products, resources, and customer behaviour to better understand what practitioners need. Interview with Richard Sax On 11 February 2026 there was a celebratory lunch with the past recipients of Resolution’s John Cornwell Lifetime Achievement Award, organised by David Emmerson, who here interviews Richard Sax. The Curious Case of CA 1989 Schedule 1 paragraph 2(3) Paragraph 1 of CA 1989 Schedule 1 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief against parents’. Paragraph 2 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief for persons over eighteen’. As recent cases have demonstrated this structure causes complications. is curated by The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS
KMR v AER [2026] EWFC 10 (B) DDJ Benjamin Rose. Judgment considering high-value assets, non-disclosure, jurisdictional questions, issues surrounding the validity of a nuptial settlement and general conduct of proceedings.
All Change or More of the Same? Housing Needs and Notional Property Down Under in light of Amendments to the Family Law Act 1975 [2026] 1 FRJ 55. Considering two aspects of the 2025 amendments to the Australian Family Law Act 1975: the greater recognition given to the needs of a party who has the care of a child to provide housing, and the removal of notional property or addbacks in the balance sheet in property division.
BY v GC (No 2) [2025] EWFC 397 In this seven-day final hearing of a long marriage with adult children, the computation and distribution of a variety of assets were determined by a robust analysis and application of the case law by Mr Nicholas Allen KC.
KMR v AER [2026] EWFC 10 (B) DDJ Benjamin Rose. Judgment considering high-value assets, non-disclosure, jurisdictional questions, issues surrounding the validity of a nuptial settlement and general conduct of proceedings.
All Change or More of the Same? Housing Needs and Notional Property Down Under in light of Amendments to the Family Law Act 1975 [2026] 1 FRJ 55. Considering two aspects of the 2025 amendments to the Australian Family Law Act 1975: the greater recognition given to the needs of a party who has the care of a child to provide housing, and the removal of notional property or addbacks in the balance sheet in property division.
BY v GC (No 2) [2025] EWFC 397 In this seven-day final hearing of a long marriage with adult children, the computation and distribution of a variety of assets were determined by a robust analysis and application of the case law by Mr Nicholas Allen KC.
How are family lawyers really approaching legal research and technology? Class Legal is reviewing its products, resources, and customer behaviour to better understand what practitioners need.
Interview with Richard Sax On 11 February 2026 there was a celebratory lunch with the past recipients of Resolution’s John Cornwell Lifetime Achievement Award, organised by David Emmerson, who here interviews Richard Sax.
The Curious Case of CA 1989 Schedule 1 paragraph 2(3) Paragraph 1 of CA 1989 Schedule 1 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief against parents’. Paragraph 2 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief for persons over eighteen’. As recent cases have demonstrated this structure causes complications.