N v N [2015] EWHC 514 (Fam)
Judgment date: 22 January 2015
Related
DH v RH (No 6) (Application to Set Aside) [2025] EWFC 175
MacDonald J. Ex-tempore judgment handed down almost 12 months after the final order had been made. W had made various applications following the final order, including to set aside the final order and to commit H, whilst H in response to W’s failure to comply had also made multiple applications.
Collardeau v Fuchs [2025] EWFC 307
Poole J. Enforcement and variation: the court quantified arrears, discharged and capitalised the respondent husband's mortgage undertaking, replaced multiple undertakings with quantified periodical payments, and ordered immediate enforcement where H frustrated a sealed final financial remedy order.
Collardeau v Fuchs [2025] EWFC 307
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/307
Read the journal


Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 2 | Summer
Related
DH v RH (No 6) (Application to Set Aside) [2025] EWFC 175
MacDonald J. Ex-tempore judgment handed down almost 12 months after the final order had been made. W had made various applications following the final order, including to set aside the final order and to commit H, whilst H in response to W’s failure to comply had also made multiple applications.
Collardeau v Fuchs [2025] EWFC 307
Poole J. Enforcement and variation: the court quantified arrears, discharged and capitalised the respondent husband's mortgage undertaking, replaced multiple undertakings with quantified periodical payments, and ordered immediate enforcement where H frustrated a sealed final financial remedy order.
Collardeau v Fuchs [2025] EWFC 307
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/307
Latest

Open Justice in the Modern Age
A guest lecture delivered on Tuesday, 7 October 2025, at 6pm, at George Town, Grand Cayman.

Applied Theatre and the Advocacy Gap in Financial Remedies
Closing the gap between legal recognition and judicial persuasion.

War (of the Roses) – What Is It Good For?
The release of a new film has sparked a wave of commentary from the press and family lawyers alike. It shows that bloody mindedness and divorce are a timeless combination. Contains spoilers!