Murphy v Murphy [2014] EWHC 2263 (Fam)
Judgment date: 04 July 2014
Related
P v M (Appeal: Unfair Hearing: Variation of Periodical Payments: Global Orders) [2026] EWHC 1330 (Fam)
Judgment date: 3 June 2026
Harrison J allows an appeal against a final order made by HHJ Wright, which varied a previous order made by DDJ Butler, which reduced periodical payments paid to W due to a change in H’s income.
NI v AD [2025] EWHC 2997 (Fam)
Trowell J. Wife (NI) and husband (AD) cohabited for 7 years and share 3 children, aged, 11, 9 and 8 years. This is a cross application for financial relief upon their divorce. Oral evidence was heard from husband, wife and two expert forensic accountants.
Finality and Funding: The Implications of a Clean Break following CC v UU
The judgment of Peel J in CC v UU [2025] EWFC 214 provides a further glimpse of the LSPO regime, and seeks to establish definitively when the opportunity to seek an LSPO ceases.
Related
P v M (Appeal: Unfair Hearing: Variation of Periodical Payments: Global Orders) [2026] EWHC 1330 (Fam)
Judgment date: 3 June 2026
Harrison J allows an appeal against a final order made by HHJ Wright, which varied a previous order made by DDJ Butler, which reduced periodical payments paid to W due to a change in H’s income.
NI v AD [2025] EWHC 2997 (Fam)
Trowell J. Wife (NI) and husband (AD) cohabited for 7 years and share 3 children, aged, 11, 9 and 8 years. This is a cross application for financial relief upon their divorce. Oral evidence was heard from husband, wife and two expert forensic accountants.
Finality and Funding: The Implications of a Clean Break following CC v UU
The judgment of Peel J in CC v UU [2025] EWFC 214 provides a further glimpse of the LSPO regime, and seeks to establish definitively when the opportunity to seek an LSPO ceases.
Latest
The Case for Calderbank: A Procedural Reform Too Far?
[2026] 3 FRJ 208. There were legitimate objections to a costs system in which parties could face substantial consequences for failing to predict with sufficient accuracy the outcome of a highly discretionary financial remedy exercise. But it does not follow that Calderbank itself was the problem.
Small Money Cases: Managing Financial Remedies Cases Where There Is Not Enough to Go Round
From possible insolvency to arguments about add-back, small money cases raise many of the same issues as big money cases yet are often the hardest fought and difficult to settle at the Financial Dispute Resolution (FDR) appointment. The difference is simply that there is not enough to go round.
Selling the Goose: Orders for Sale of the Family Company
[2026] 3 FRJ 194. This article considers recent authorities which suggest that forcing a sale of the family company may increasingly be contemplated by the court.