Murphy v Murphy [2014] EWHC 2263 (Fam)
Judgment date: 04 July 2014
Related
NI v AD [2025] EWHC 2997 (Fam)
Trowell J. Wife (NI) and husband (AD) cohabited for 7 years and share 3 children, aged, 11, 9 and 8 years. This is a cross application for financial relief upon their divorce. Oral evidence was heard from husband, wife and two expert forensic accountants.
Finality and Funding: The Implications of a Clean Break following CC v UU
The judgment of Peel J in CC v UU [2025] EWFC 214 provides a further glimpse of the LSPO regime, and seeks to establish definitively when the opportunity to seek an LSPO ceases.
‘You Want Me to Do What Now?’ – The Return-to-Work Question and the Quiet Cost of Executive Marriage
Introduction – the question that reveals the gap
She hadn’t written a CV in 20 years.
Hadn’t needed to.
When her ex’s career took off, they moved every few years. She held everything else together while he earned the money. But ‘everything else’ was a lot. A job
Related
NI v AD [2025] EWHC 2997 (Fam)
Trowell J. Wife (NI) and husband (AD) cohabited for 7 years and share 3 children, aged, 11, 9 and 8 years. This is a cross application for financial relief upon their divorce. Oral evidence was heard from husband, wife and two expert forensic accountants.
Finality and Funding: The Implications of a Clean Break following CC v UU
The judgment of Peel J in CC v UU [2025] EWFC 214 provides a further glimpse of the LSPO regime, and seeks to establish definitively when the opportunity to seek an LSPO ceases.
‘You Want Me to Do What Now?’ – The Return-to-Work Question and the Quiet Cost of Executive Marriage
Introduction – the question that reveals the gap
She hadn’t written a CV in 20 years.
Hadn’t needed to.
When her ex’s career took off, they moved every few years. She held everything else together while he earned the money. But ‘everything else’ was a lot. A job
Latest
Book Review: The Road to Equal Partnership
Professor Sharon Thompson’s new book could not have landed at a better moment. The Road to Equal Partnership (Bristol University Press) sets out an agenda for the reform of Financial Remedies law, in light of the Law Commission’s scoping paper.
Keep Calm and Carry on: A v M in a Wells World
[2026] 2 FRJ 114. This article takes a closer look at how Carry was shared in the cases of A v M and ED v AP, and the different approaches adopted for its assessment. It concludes by proposing an alternative method by which Carry can be shared when the timing of future receipts is unknown.
Thwaite – The Jury Remains Out
[2026] 2 FRJ 99. Does the Thwaite jurisdiction still exist? If it does, what is its appropriate scope? The Court of Appeal will be required to decide.