Cases Enforcement (International) Open in MS v PS (Enforcement Procedure under the Maintenance Regulation: Reference to CJEU) [2016] EWHC 88 (Fam) Judgment date: 21 January 2016http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2016/88.html Related Collardeau v Fuchs: Contempt of Court [2025] EWFC 413 Poole J. An application for committal to prison for contempt of court following alleged breaches of an order made varying a final financial order. JQ v IQ [2025] EWFC 192 (B) Judgment date: 23 June 2025 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/192 HHJ Vincent. A Pakistani divorce was deemed to be valid in the UK on public policy grounds and permission was granted for the wife to bring financial remedies proceedings in this jurisdiction. This hearing concerned the Sandeep Kumar Chugh v Latika Chugh [2025] EWFC 42 Judgment date: 04 March 2025 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/42 Nicholas Allen KC (sitting as a deputy High Court judge). Final hearing concerning H’s application for recognition of divorce proceedings brought by H in India, and H’s challenge to the jurisdictional basis of divorce proceedings Read the journal Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 2 | Summer Open in Related Collardeau v Fuchs: Contempt of Court [2025] EWFC 413 Poole J. An application for committal to prison for contempt of court following alleged breaches of an order made varying a final financial order. JQ v IQ [2025] EWFC 192 (B) Judgment date: 23 June 2025 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/192 HHJ Vincent. A Pakistani divorce was deemed to be valid in the UK on public policy grounds and permission was granted for the wife to bring financial remedies proceedings in this jurisdiction. This hearing concerned the Sandeep Kumar Chugh v Latika Chugh [2025] EWFC 42 Judgment date: 04 March 2025 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/42 Nicholas Allen KC (sitting as a deputy High Court judge). Final hearing concerning H’s application for recognition of divorce proceedings brought by H in India, and H’s challenge to the jurisdictional basis of divorce proceedings Latest Pets on Divorce and Separation: Why the Consultation Matters The Working Group on Pets on Divorce and Separation is concerned about the lack of guidance in relation to pets as chattels. The current reform project provides an opportunity to consider whether the approach taken in jurisdictions such as Spain and Australia would be appropriate here. Bringing Child Welfare to the Fore: Why the Financial Remedies Reform Consultation Should Unify the Section 25 Checklist Caroline Bowden, Sophie Connors and James Pirrie, working as part of a reform sub-group of the Family Solutions Group, propose an adjustment of s 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, merging and reassembling subsections (2) and (3). A Fairer End to Relationships? Some Reflections on the Core Principles of the Government’s Proposals to Reform the Law of Financial Remedies on Divorce. In June 2026, the Ministry of Justice published ‘A fairer end to relationships’, a wide-ranging consultation on reforms to the law of financial remedies on divorce, and to the position of cohabitants. This piece focuses on the central principles of the proposed reforms. is curated by The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS
Collardeau v Fuchs: Contempt of Court [2025] EWFC 413 Poole J. An application for committal to prison for contempt of court following alleged breaches of an order made varying a final financial order.
JQ v IQ [2025] EWFC 192 (B) Judgment date: 23 June 2025 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/192 HHJ Vincent. A Pakistani divorce was deemed to be valid in the UK on public policy grounds and permission was granted for the wife to bring financial remedies proceedings in this jurisdiction. This hearing concerned the
Sandeep Kumar Chugh v Latika Chugh [2025] EWFC 42 Judgment date: 04 March 2025 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/42 Nicholas Allen KC (sitting as a deputy High Court judge). Final hearing concerning H’s application for recognition of divorce proceedings brought by H in India, and H’s challenge to the jurisdictional basis of divorce proceedings
Collardeau v Fuchs: Contempt of Court [2025] EWFC 413 Poole J. An application for committal to prison for contempt of court following alleged breaches of an order made varying a final financial order.
JQ v IQ [2025] EWFC 192 (B) Judgment date: 23 June 2025 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/192 HHJ Vincent. A Pakistani divorce was deemed to be valid in the UK on public policy grounds and permission was granted for the wife to bring financial remedies proceedings in this jurisdiction. This hearing concerned the
Sandeep Kumar Chugh v Latika Chugh [2025] EWFC 42 Judgment date: 04 March 2025 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/42 Nicholas Allen KC (sitting as a deputy High Court judge). Final hearing concerning H’s application for recognition of divorce proceedings brought by H in India, and H’s challenge to the jurisdictional basis of divorce proceedings
Pets on Divorce and Separation: Why the Consultation Matters The Working Group on Pets on Divorce and Separation is concerned about the lack of guidance in relation to pets as chattels. The current reform project provides an opportunity to consider whether the approach taken in jurisdictions such as Spain and Australia would be appropriate here.
Bringing Child Welfare to the Fore: Why the Financial Remedies Reform Consultation Should Unify the Section 25 Checklist Caroline Bowden, Sophie Connors and James Pirrie, working as part of a reform sub-group of the Family Solutions Group, propose an adjustment of s 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, merging and reassembling subsections (2) and (3).
A Fairer End to Relationships? Some Reflections on the Core Principles of the Government’s Proposals to Reform the Law of Financial Remedies on Divorce. In June 2026, the Ministry of Justice published ‘A fairer end to relationships’, a wide-ranging consultation on reforms to the law of financial remedies on divorce, and to the position of cohabitants. This piece focuses on the central principles of the proposed reforms.