MB v EB [2019] EWHC 1649 (Fam)
Judgment date: 25 June 2019
Related
MR v EF [2024] EWFC 144 (B)
Judgment date: 20 June 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2024/144
Recorder Rhys Taylor in financial remedy proceedings makes findings in favour of the wife as to the date of separation of the parties.
The parties cohabited from 1978 and married in 1980 but could not agree
S v S [2023] EWFC 269
Judgment date: 07 June 2023
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2023/269.html
Background
HHJ Booth prefers Moylan LJ’s approach to matrimonial/non-matrimonial property, in which a scientific approach only takes one so far and the court must apply its discretion, over Mostyn J’s more
SS v ES [2023] EWFC 177
Judgment date: 13 October 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2023/177
Sir Jonathan Cohen. W’s application for financial remedy which included aspects of pre-marital property, post-separation accrual and Wells sharing.
The parties married in 2005 with no pre-matrimonial cohabitation. They had three children aged between 12 and
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 3 | Winter
Related
MR v EF [2024] EWFC 144 (B)
Judgment date: 20 June 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2024/144
Recorder Rhys Taylor in financial remedy proceedings makes findings in favour of the wife as to the date of separation of the parties.
The parties cohabited from 1978 and married in 1980 but could not agree
S v S [2023] EWFC 269
Judgment date: 07 June 2023
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2023/269.html
Background
HHJ Booth prefers Moylan LJ’s approach to matrimonial/non-matrimonial property, in which a scientific approach only takes one so far and the court must apply its discretion, over Mostyn J’s more
SS v ES [2023] EWFC 177
Judgment date: 13 October 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2023/177
Sir Jonathan Cohen. W’s application for financial remedy which included aspects of pre-marital property, post-separation accrual and Wells sharing.
The parties married in 2005 with no pre-matrimonial cohabitation. They had three children aged between 12 and
Latest
An End to Secrecy in Family Courts? Proposed Reforms of Contempt of Court Law That Could Lift the Threats to Sharing Information
It’s common knowledge that people involved in family court proceedings held in private are very restricted in what they can say about what’s happening. The confusing part is when someone might be in contempt of court just for talking or writing about their case, even when anonymised.
The Absent Owner – Varying Beneficial Interests Upon Separation: an Analysis of the Leading Cases
Considering TLATA cases where A and B are joint owners of a family home, the relationship breaks down, and A vacates leaving B in occupation and financially responsible for the property, and then A returns years later seeking their share of the net equity.
When Might an Arbitration Not Be Entirely Private and Confidential?
One of the great virtues of family law arbitration is its ability to provide the parties with confidentiality and privacy for their dispute. Unlike court proceedings, the parties will not face the risk of the hearing taking place in open court with curious members of the public present.