MB v EB [2019] EWHC 1649 (Fam)
Judgment date: 25 June 2019
Related
MR v EF [2024] EWFC 144 (B)
Judgment date: 20 June 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2024/144
Recorder Rhys Taylor in financial remedy proceedings makes findings in favour of the wife as to the date of separation of the parties.
The parties cohabited from 1978 and married in 1980 but could not agree
S v S [2023] EWFC 269
Judgment date: 07 June 2023
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2023/269.html
Background
HHJ Booth prefers Moylan LJ’s approach to matrimonial/non-matrimonial property, in which a scientific approach only takes one so far and the court must apply its discretion, over Mostyn J’s more
SS v ES [2023] EWFC 177
Judgment date: 13 October 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2023/177
Sir Jonathan Cohen. W’s application for financial remedy which included aspects of pre-marital property, post-separation accrual and Wells sharing.
The parties married in 2005 with no pre-matrimonial cohabitation. They had three children aged between 12 and
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 3 | Winter
Related
MR v EF [2024] EWFC 144 (B)
Judgment date: 20 June 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2024/144
Recorder Rhys Taylor in financial remedy proceedings makes findings in favour of the wife as to the date of separation of the parties.
The parties cohabited from 1978 and married in 1980 but could not agree
S v S [2023] EWFC 269
Judgment date: 07 June 2023
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2023/269.html
Background
HHJ Booth prefers Moylan LJ’s approach to matrimonial/non-matrimonial property, in which a scientific approach only takes one so far and the court must apply its discretion, over Mostyn J’s more
SS v ES [2023] EWFC 177
Judgment date: 13 October 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2023/177
Sir Jonathan Cohen. W’s application for financial remedy which included aspects of pre-marital property, post-separation accrual and Wells sharing.
The parties married in 2005 with no pre-matrimonial cohabitation. They had three children aged between 12 and
Latest
Delaying Departure? Domicile in Divorce Cases
[2026] 1 FRJ 16. In Ramana v Kist Ramana [2025] EWCA Civ 1022, [2025] 4 WLR 120 the Court of Appeal was concerned with the question of how a domicile of choice may be lost. This article explores the arguments made at the hearing, the court’s decision and reasoning, and the likely implications.
Stop! In the Name of the LSA: Why Your Favourite Legal Exec Can’t Touch That Form A after Mazur and XX v GH
HHJ Farquhar was confronted with the practical consequences of Mazur for family law cases. The issue arose when Family Law Partners, a highly respected specialist family law firm, sought an exemption permitting their senior Chartered Legal Executive, Ms Lisa Burton Durham, to conduct litigation.
Book Review: Financial Remedies Handbook 2025
[2026] 1 FRJ 74. Rhys Taylor reviews the 15th edition of Financial Remedies Handbook 2026, by District Judge Sophie Harrison, published by LexisNexis, and says every financial remedy lawyer should have it by their side.