L-K v K (Brussels II Revised: MPS) [2006] EWHC 153 (Fam)

Judgment date: 10 February 2006

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2006/153.html

Related

OO v QQ [2025] EWFC 310 (B)

HHJ Hyde KC. Final hearing in financial remedy proceedings. The husband had failed to engage with most of the process. The case was determined on a needs basis given the wife’s terminal cancer diagnosis.

LMZ v AMZ [2024] EWFC 28

Judgment date: 12 February 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/28 Moor J. A striking age difference, 48 years between the parties, gives rise to a strong needs-based claim. Background * Both parties were born in Iraq and married in September 1999. At that time, H was 68 and

BN v MA [2013] EWHC 4250 (Fam)

Judgment date: 10 December 2013 http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2013/4250.html

Read the journal

Related

OO v QQ [2025] EWFC 310 (B)

HHJ Hyde KC. Final hearing in financial remedy proceedings. The husband had failed to engage with most of the process. The case was determined on a needs basis given the wife’s terminal cancer diagnosis.

LMZ v AMZ [2024] EWFC 28

Judgment date: 12 February 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/28 Moor J. A striking age difference, 48 years between the parties, gives rise to a strong needs-based claim. Background * Both parties were born in Iraq and married in September 1999. At that time, H was 68 and

BN v MA [2013] EWHC 4250 (Fam)

Judgment date: 10 December 2013 http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2013/4250.html

Latest

Mazur in the Court of Appeal: the Judgment That Saved Half the Profession from Accidental Criminality

Mazur in the Court of Appeal: the Judgment That Saved Half the Profession from Accidental Criminality

The Court of Appeal rewrites the landscape of ‘conduct of litigation’ – Mazur & Stuart v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP & Ors [2026] EWCA Civ 369.

Portals: Bringing It All Together

Portals: Bringing It All Together

Tips and tricks on using the digital court portals from a member of the stakeholder group for the profession, including how to avoid the double login, when to denote documents as confidential, and how to prompt a response from the court.

FRJ – ‘Well, He (or She) Didn’t Ask!’ – the Impact of Non-Disclosure When the Question Isn’t Asked

FRJ – ‘Well, He (or She) Didn’t Ask!’ – the Impact of Non-Disclosure When the Question Isn’t Asked

Is it a shield to non-disclosure by one party during financial remedy proceedings if the other party could (and perhaps should) have asked? The duty on parties to give full and frank financial disclosure is not merely a private obligation between them; it is a duty to the court.

is curated by

The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software

EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS