L-K v K (Brussels II Revised: MPS) [2006] EWHC 153 (Fam)
Judgment date: 10 February 2006
Related
OO v QQ [2025] EWFC 310 (B)
HHJ Hyde KC. Final hearing in financial remedy proceedings. The husband had failed to engage with most of the process. The case was determined on a needs basis given the wife’s terminal cancer diagnosis.
LMZ v AMZ [2024] EWFC 28
Judgment date: 12 February 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/28
Moor J. A striking age difference, 48 years between the parties, gives rise to a strong needs-based claim.
Background
* Both parties were born in Iraq and married in September 1999. At that time, H was 68 and
BN v MA [2013] EWHC 4250 (Fam)
Judgment date: 10 December 2013
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2013/4250.html
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 3 | Winter
Related
OO v QQ [2025] EWFC 310 (B)
HHJ Hyde KC. Final hearing in financial remedy proceedings. The husband had failed to engage with most of the process. The case was determined on a needs basis given the wife’s terminal cancer diagnosis.
LMZ v AMZ [2024] EWFC 28
Judgment date: 12 February 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/28
Moor J. A striking age difference, 48 years between the parties, gives rise to a strong needs-based claim.
Background
* Both parties were born in Iraq and married in September 1999. At that time, H was 68 and
BN v MA [2013] EWHC 4250 (Fam)
Judgment date: 10 December 2013
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2013/4250.html
Latest
Piercing Trust Structures in Switzerland in Aid of Financial Claims in England
[2026] 1 FRJ 26. Swiss courts possess domestic tools to pierce through foreign trust structures and make orders in respect of their underlying assets. This article examines what those tools are and how they may be deployed in aid of financial remedies proceedings in England.
Delaying Departure? Domicile in Divorce Cases
[2026] 1 FRJ 16. In Ramana v Kist Ramana [2025] EWCA Civ 1022, [2025] 4 WLR 120 the Court of Appeal was concerned with the question of how a domicile of choice may be lost. This article explores the arguments made at the hearing, the court’s decision and reasoning, and the likely implications.
Stop! In the Name of the LSA: Why Your Favourite Legal Exec Can’t Touch That Form A after Mazur and XX v GH
HHJ Farquhar was confronted with the practical consequences of Mazur for family law cases. The issue arose when Family Law Partners, a highly respected specialist family law firm, sought an exemption permitting their senior Chartered Legal Executive, Ms Lisa Burton Durham, to conduct litigation.