Chai v Peng [2014] EWHC 750 (Fam)
Judgment date: 13 March 2014
Related
OO v QQ [2025] EWFC 310 (B)
HHJ Hyde KC. Final hearing in financial remedy proceedings. The husband had failed to engage with most of the process. The case was determined on a needs basis given the wife’s terminal cancer diagnosis.
LMZ v AMZ [2024] EWFC 28
Judgment date: 12 February 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/28
Moor J. A striking age difference, 48 years between the parties, gives rise to a strong needs-based claim.
Background
* Both parties were born in Iraq and married in September 1999. At that time, H was 68 and
L-K v K (Brussels II Revised: MPS) [2006] EWHC 153 (Fam)
Judgment date: 10 February 2006
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2006/153.html
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring
Related
OO v QQ [2025] EWFC 310 (B)
HHJ Hyde KC. Final hearing in financial remedy proceedings. The husband had failed to engage with most of the process. The case was determined on a needs basis given the wife’s terminal cancer diagnosis.
LMZ v AMZ [2024] EWFC 28
Judgment date: 12 February 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/28
Moor J. A striking age difference, 48 years between the parties, gives rise to a strong needs-based claim.
Background
* Both parties were born in Iraq and married in September 1999. At that time, H was 68 and
L-K v K (Brussels II Revised: MPS) [2006] EWHC 153 (Fam)
Judgment date: 10 February 2006
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2006/153.html
Latest
How are family lawyers really approaching legal research and technology?
Class Legal is reviewing its products, resources, and customer behaviour to better understand what practitioners need.
Interview with Richard Sax
On 11 February 2026 there was a celebratory lunch with the past recipients of Resolution’s John Cornwell Lifetime Achievement Award, organised by David Emmerson, who here interviews Richard Sax.
The Curious Case of CA 1989 Schedule 1 paragraph 2(3)
Paragraph 1 of CA 1989 Schedule 1 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief against parents’. Paragraph 2 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief for persons over eighteen’. As recent cases have demonstrated this structure causes complications.