L [2015] EWFC 15
Judgment date: 26 February 2015
Related
FPR PD 27A and Procedural Ambush – A Litigant in Person’s Perspective
This article, the anonymous writer explains, is not about abuse during the marriage, but rather the abuse hidden in court procedure, in particular how the habitual disregard of FPR PD 27A1 paves the way to procedural ambush, why this matters, and what must change in order to safeguard justice.
AB v CD [2025] EWFC 253 (B)
DJ Dodsworth’s short judgment gives a blueprint of how not to prepare a case for trial, and how not to make a relief from sanctions application.
T v T and Others (Disregard for Procedural Rules, Adjournment) [2025] EWFC 14 (B)
Judgment date: 29 January 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/14
Recorder Chandler KC was forced to adjourn a three-day hearing in the face of W’s legal aid solicitors failing to comply with the Family Court’s procedures. The judge made it clear that where a
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 2 | Summer
Related
FPR PD 27A and Procedural Ambush – A Litigant in Person’s Perspective
This article, the anonymous writer explains, is not about abuse during the marriage, but rather the abuse hidden in court procedure, in particular how the habitual disregard of FPR PD 27A1 paves the way to procedural ambush, why this matters, and what must change in order to safeguard justice.
AB v CD [2025] EWFC 253 (B)
DJ Dodsworth’s short judgment gives a blueprint of how not to prepare a case for trial, and how not to make a relief from sanctions application.
T v T and Others (Disregard for Procedural Rules, Adjournment) [2025] EWFC 14 (B)
Judgment date: 29 January 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/14
Recorder Chandler KC was forced to adjourn a three-day hearing in the face of W’s legal aid solicitors failing to comply with the Family Court’s procedures. The judge made it clear that where a
Latest
The Fairer End to Relationships Consultation: The FRJ's Complete Coverage
The Government's Fairer End to Relationships consultation has sparked significant discussion about the future of cohabitation, marriage, divorce and financial remedies on relationship breakdown. Throughout the consultation period, we have published a series of articles exploring the key proposals, their potential impact on individuals and families, and the
What Family Lawyers Can Learn from Both Sides of the Border
Reform of this scale invites comparison. At a recent roundtable, family law specialists from Hugh James and Brodies brought together practitioners from Wales and Scotland to test where each jurisdiction might learn from the other.
Burning Down the House (That We Once Shared for 3 Years) to Roast the Pig: The Problem with the Cohabitation Reform Proposals
Part 2 of the Ministry of Justice’s consultation paper, A Fairer End to Relationships, proposes a financial remedies scheme for cohabitants on separation. It casts the net far too wide. If legislation goes through as proposed, an unfair regime will be foisted on millions of couples.