Kicinski v Pardi [2021] EWHC 499
Judgment date: 05 March 2021
Related
AP v TP (Pension Enforcement) [2025] EWFC 190 (B)
Judgment date: 13 June 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/190
Summary
HHJ Farquhar. Application by husband (applicant) to set aside a pension sharing order (PSO) under the Thwaite jurisdiction due to the wife’s sustained non-compliance. The court held that continued enforcement of the PSO would
M v B [2025] EWFC 182
Judgment date: 25 June 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/182
Sir Jonathan Cohen (sitting as a judge of the High Court). Financial remedy proceedings considering the court’s power to strike out applications under FPR 4.4, having regard to the effect of FPR 9.9A.
The
Hersman v De Verchere [2024] EWHC 905 (Fam)
Judgment date: 19 April 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/905
Moor J. Enforcement proceedings following W’s failure to transfer a ski chalet to H. W previously committed to three months’ imprisonment but has not returned to the UK. H awarded £2.3m on account of
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 3 | Winter
Related
AP v TP (Pension Enforcement) [2025] EWFC 190 (B)
Judgment date: 13 June 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/190
Summary
HHJ Farquhar. Application by husband (applicant) to set aside a pension sharing order (PSO) under the Thwaite jurisdiction due to the wife’s sustained non-compliance. The court held that continued enforcement of the PSO would
M v B [2025] EWFC 182
Judgment date: 25 June 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/182
Sir Jonathan Cohen (sitting as a judge of the High Court). Financial remedy proceedings considering the court’s power to strike out applications under FPR 4.4, having regard to the effect of FPR 9.9A.
The
Hersman v De Verchere [2024] EWHC 905 (Fam)
Judgment date: 19 April 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/905
Moor J. Enforcement proceedings following W’s failure to transfer a ski chalet to H. W previously committed to three months’ imprisonment but has not returned to the UK. H awarded £2.3m on account of
Latest
When Might an Arbitration Not Be Entirely Private and Confidential?
One of the great virtues of family law arbitration is its ability to provide the parties with confidentiality and privacy for their dispute. Unlike court proceedings, the parties will not face the risk of the hearing taking place in open court with curious members of the public present.
National Iranian Oil Company v Retirement, Savings and Welfare Fund of Oil Industry Workers v Crescent Gas Corporation Limited [2025] EWCA Civ 211 and Its Implications for TLATA Cases
The Court of Appeal confirms that a declaration of trust respecting land or any interest therein requires the personal signature of the settlor, not a third party on their behalf. This has implications where it is alleged a trust of land has arisen by virtue of an express declaration of trust.
Bundle of Joy: New Practice Direction on Bundles, Position Statements etc., Effective 2 March 2026
Practice Guidance Update No. 6 of 2025 contains amendments to a range of existing FPR PDs, including a comprehensive re-writing of PD 27A, which started life as the ‘Bundles Direction’.