Johnson v Takieddine & Anor [2016] EWHC 1895 (Fam)
Judgment date: 02 June 2016
Related
AN v NT [2025] EWFC 456
Peel J. How can a party obtain without-notice injunctive relief pending leave under Part III MFPA 1984 following Potanina v Potanin?
Potanina v Potanin (No 2) [2025] EWCA Civ 1136
Moylan, Falk and Cobb LJJ. The Wife’s appeal from the order made by Cohen J on 8 November 2019, in proceedings under Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984.
Awolowo v Awolowo & Anor [2025] EWCA Civ 641
Moylan LJ, Popplewell LJ and Sir Christopher Floyd. Wife wins appeal over £1.6m ‘loan’ tied to the family home.
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring
Related
AN v NT [2025] EWFC 456
Peel J. How can a party obtain without-notice injunctive relief pending leave under Part III MFPA 1984 following Potanina v Potanin?
Potanina v Potanin (No 2) [2025] EWCA Civ 1136
Moylan, Falk and Cobb LJJ. The Wife’s appeal from the order made by Cohen J on 8 November 2019, in proceedings under Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984.
Awolowo v Awolowo & Anor [2025] EWCA Civ 641
Moylan LJ, Popplewell LJ and Sir Christopher Floyd. Wife wins appeal over £1.6m ‘loan’ tied to the family home.
Latest
Portals: Bringing It All Together
Tips and tricks on using the digital court portals from a member of the stakeholder group for the profession, including how to avoid the double login, when to denote documents as confidential, and how to prompt a response from the court.
FRJ – ‘Well, He (or She) Didn’t Ask!’ – the Impact of Non-Disclosure When the Question Isn’t Asked
Is it a shield to non-disclosure by one party during financial remedy proceedings if the other party could (and perhaps should) have asked? The duty on parties to give full and frank financial disclosure is not merely a private obligation between them; it is a duty to the court.
The Reluctant Pension Credit Member
[2026] 1 FRJ 39. In the case of AP v TP [2025] EWFC 190 (B) a financial remedy order was made by consent, following an FDR, which included a pension sharing order in W’s favour. Difficulties began when W failed to provide the necessary information to permit the pension share to be implemented.