H v H [2007] EWHC 459 (Fam), [2007] 2 FLR 548
Judgment date: 04 April 2007
Related
BI v EN [2024] EWFC 200 (Fam)
Judgment date: 29 July 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/200
Decision of Cusworth J concluding financial remedy proceedings between W and H. The principal issue concerned the extent to which the outcome of W’s application for financial remedies should be impacted by the ‘Contrat de Mariage’
AT v BT [2023] EWHC 3531 (Fam)
Judgment date: 06 November 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/3531
Francis J. A final hearing in H’s financial remedy application.
W sought a lump sum of £9.145m on the basis of sharing and compensation. H asserted this was a needs case due to the
H v W [2023] EWFC 120
Judgment date: 14 July 2023
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2023/120.html
HHJ Reardon KC. This case concerns cross-applications regarding a final financial remedy order made in May 2021 (the 2021 order) by Recorder Anderson. This included an application by H for a further lump sum
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 3 | Winter
Related
BI v EN [2024] EWFC 200 (Fam)
Judgment date: 29 July 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/200
Decision of Cusworth J concluding financial remedy proceedings between W and H. The principal issue concerned the extent to which the outcome of W’s application for financial remedies should be impacted by the ‘Contrat de Mariage’
AT v BT [2023] EWHC 3531 (Fam)
Judgment date: 06 November 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/3531
Francis J. A final hearing in H’s financial remedy application.
W sought a lump sum of £9.145m on the basis of sharing and compensation. H asserted this was a needs case due to the
H v W [2023] EWFC 120
Judgment date: 14 July 2023
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2023/120.html
HHJ Reardon KC. This case concerns cross-applications regarding a final financial remedy order made in May 2021 (the 2021 order) by Recorder Anderson. This included an application by H for a further lump sum
Latest
An End to Secrecy in Family Courts? Proposed Reforms of Contempt of Court Law That Could Lift the Threats to Sharing Information
It’s common knowledge that people involved in family court proceedings held in private are very restricted in what they can say about what’s happening. The confusing part is when someone might be in contempt of court just for talking or writing about their case, even when anonymised.
The Absent Owner – Varying Beneficial Interests Upon Separation: an Analysis of the Leading Cases
Considering TLATA cases where A and B are joint owners of a family home, the relationship breaks down, and A vacates leaving B in occupation and financially responsible for the property, and then A returns years later seeking their share of the net equity.
When Might an Arbitration Not Be Entirely Private and Confidential?
One of the great virtues of family law arbitration is its ability to provide the parties with confidentiality and privacy for their dispute. Unlike court proceedings, the parties will not face the risk of the hearing taking place in open court with curious members of the public present.