George Williamson
Founder and CEO of Level.
Related
Tim Amos KC
Tim Amos is a barrister in international family law and formerly Head of Chambers at QEB (Queen Elizabeth Building): 2018โ23. He has practised at QEB since 1988 and took silk in 2008 as QC (now KC). His practice spans all aspects of family law (including pre-nups and nuptial trusts)
Yudhajit Jha
Yudhajit Jha is a recent law graduate from the University of Exeter, currently working as a Trainee Legal Assistant at a firm while also volunteering with Citizens Advice.
Caitlin McHale
Caitlin McHale is a paralegal at Craig Solicitors where she supports the firm on financial remedy and private children law matters. She is due to commence pupillage at 1 Hare Court in October 2025.
Related
Tim Amos KC
Tim Amos is a barrister in international family law and formerly Head of Chambers at QEB (Queen Elizabeth Building): 2018โ23. He has practised at QEB since 1988 and took silk in 2008 as QC (now KC). His practice spans all aspects of family law (including pre-nups and nuptial trusts)
Yudhajit Jha
Yudhajit Jha is a recent law graduate from the University of Exeter, currently working as a Trainee Legal Assistant at a firm while also volunteering with Citizens Advice.
Caitlin McHale
Caitlin McHale is a paralegal at Craig Solicitors where she supports the firm on financial remedy and private children law matters. She is due to commence pupillage at 1 Hare Court in October 2025.
Latest
In Defence of Legal Fee Loans: The Economics of Access to Justice
The recent High Court judgment of Peel J in ๐๐ช๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐ท ๐๐ฆ๐ท๐ฆ๐ญ [2025] EWFC 89 has renewed focus on the role of legal fee lending in family proceedings. This coincides with significant judicial commentary about funding arrangements, including notable judgments in ๐๐๐ ๐ท ๐๐๐ and ๐๐ ๐ท ๐๐.
Final Reflections on Standish: Was It All Worthwhile?
If asked, Mr Standish may say that three rounds of litigation, with another to follow, were worth it โ Mrs Standish, perhaps not. But for lawyers, with many questions left unanswered, and a feeling that the opportunity to settle the law on matrimonialisation with clarity and certainty has passed us by,
OS v DT and Post-Separation Income: Fairness Trumps Inflexibility
In โPost-Separation Income: Has Rossi Survived Waggott and Standish?โ (5 February 2025), Nicholas Allen KC considered the potential impact of Waggott v Waggott [2018] 2 FLR 406 on the argument that income (or the assets or capital generated therefrom) earned in or referable to the first 12 months post-separation should