national archives Nuptial Agreements Open in FO v PN [2025] EWFC 327 (B) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/327?query=FO+PN HHJ Hess Related EC v EC [2026] EWFC 275 23 September 2026. Preliminary issue hearing concerning the validity of a pre-nuptial agreement. Peel J emphasised that considering a nuptial agreement at a preliminary hearing is an available option but will be the exception rather than the rule. EC v EC [2026] EWFC 275 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2026/275 IC v AD [2026] EWFC 224 20 July 2026. HHJ Hess (sitting as a deputy High Court judge). Final hearing to consider the extent to which the terms of a pre-nuptial agreement should be upheld following an assessment of the parties' needs. Read the journal Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 2 | Summer Open in Related EC v EC [2026] EWFC 275 23 September 2026. Preliminary issue hearing concerning the validity of a pre-nuptial agreement. Peel J emphasised that considering a nuptial agreement at a preliminary hearing is an available option but will be the exception rather than the rule. EC v EC [2026] EWFC 275 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2026/275 IC v AD [2026] EWFC 224 20 July 2026. HHJ Hess (sitting as a deputy High Court judge). Final hearing to consider the extent to which the terms of a pre-nuptial agreement should be upheld following an assessment of the parties' needs. Latest Selling the Goose: Orders for Sale of the Family Company [2026] 3 FRJ 194. This article considers recent authorities which suggest that forcing a sale of the family company may increasingly be contemplated by the court. Tech Corner: Only 11%. What Technology Can Do About the Pensions Gap on Divorce [2026] 3 FRJ 266. Only 11% of divorcees with a pension not yet in payment made any arrangement to share it, according to the Fair Shares study, which also found that over a third of divorcees did not know the value of their own pension. Ignoring the pensions is not an option. Costs in Financial Remedy Proceedings: Time for Greater Discipline? [2026] 3 FRJ 206. If costs discipline is to be meaningful, parties must understand from the outset that disproportionate litigation expenditure will ultimately remain their own responsibility even in a needs case. Money spent on costs is money removed from the resources available to the family. is curated by The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS
EC v EC [2026] EWFC 275 23 September 2026. Preliminary issue hearing concerning the validity of a pre-nuptial agreement. Peel J emphasised that considering a nuptial agreement at a preliminary hearing is an available option but will be the exception rather than the rule.
IC v AD [2026] EWFC 224 20 July 2026. HHJ Hess (sitting as a deputy High Court judge). Final hearing to consider the extent to which the terms of a pre-nuptial agreement should be upheld following an assessment of the parties' needs.
EC v EC [2026] EWFC 275 23 September 2026. Preliminary issue hearing concerning the validity of a pre-nuptial agreement. Peel J emphasised that considering a nuptial agreement at a preliminary hearing is an available option but will be the exception rather than the rule.
IC v AD [2026] EWFC 224 20 July 2026. HHJ Hess (sitting as a deputy High Court judge). Final hearing to consider the extent to which the terms of a pre-nuptial agreement should be upheld following an assessment of the parties' needs.
Selling the Goose: Orders for Sale of the Family Company [2026] 3 FRJ 194. This article considers recent authorities which suggest that forcing a sale of the family company may increasingly be contemplated by the court.
Tech Corner: Only 11%. What Technology Can Do About the Pensions Gap on Divorce [2026] 3 FRJ 266. Only 11% of divorcees with a pension not yet in payment made any arrangement to share it, according to the Fair Shares study, which also found that over a third of divorcees did not know the value of their own pension. Ignoring the pensions is not an option.
Costs in Financial Remedy Proceedings: Time for Greater Discipline? [2026] 3 FRJ 206. If costs discipline is to be meaningful, parties must understand from the outset that disproportionate litigation expenditure will ultimately remain their own responsibility even in a needs case. Money spent on costs is money removed from the resources available to the family.