EDG v RR (Enforcement of Foreign Maintenance Order) [2014] EWHC 816 (Fam)
Judgment date: 13 March 2014
Related
Collardeau v Fuchs: Contempt of Court [2025] EWFC 413
Poole J. An application for committal to prison for contempt of court following alleged breaches of an order made varying a final financial order.
JQ v IQ [2025] EWFC 192 (B)
Judgment date: 23 June 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/192
HHJ Vincent. A Pakistani divorce was deemed to be valid in the UK on public policy grounds and permission was granted for the wife to bring financial remedies proceedings in this jurisdiction.
This hearing concerned the
Sandeep Kumar Chugh v Latika Chugh [2025] EWFC 42
Judgment date: 04 March 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/42
Nicholas Allen KC (sitting as a deputy High Court judge). Final hearing concerning H’s application for recognition of divorce proceedings brought by H in India, and H’s challenge to the jurisdictional basis of divorce proceedings
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 2 | Summer
Related
Collardeau v Fuchs: Contempt of Court [2025] EWFC 413
Poole J. An application for committal to prison for contempt of court following alleged breaches of an order made varying a final financial order.
JQ v IQ [2025] EWFC 192 (B)
Judgment date: 23 June 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/192
HHJ Vincent. A Pakistani divorce was deemed to be valid in the UK on public policy grounds and permission was granted for the wife to bring financial remedies proceedings in this jurisdiction.
This hearing concerned the
Sandeep Kumar Chugh v Latika Chugh [2025] EWFC 42
Judgment date: 04 March 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/42
Nicholas Allen KC (sitting as a deputy High Court judge). Final hearing concerning H’s application for recognition of divorce proceedings brought by H in India, and H’s challenge to the jurisdictional basis of divorce proceedings
Latest
Tech Corner: Only 11%. What Technology Can Do About the Pensions Gap on Divorce
[2026] 3 FRJ 266. Only 11% of divorcees with a pension not yet in payment made any arrangement to share it, according to the Fair Shares study, which also found that over a third of divorcees did not know the value of their own pension. Ignoring the pensions is not an option.
Costs in Financial Remedy Proceedings: Time for Greater Discipline?
[2026] 3 FRJ 206. If costs discipline is to be meaningful, parties must understand from the outset that disproportionate litigation expenditure will ultimately remain their own responsibility even in a needs case. Money spent on costs is money removed from the resources available to the family.
IFoA Working Party for Pensions on Divorce: Full Resources Now Published
Building on the work of the Pensions Advisory Group and the IFoA thematic review of work by actuary PODEs, an IFoA working party has published essential new materials to further develop good practice in this area. Family lawyers should look for, and request, PODE adoption of these materials.