EDG v RR (Enforcement of Foreign Maintenance Order) [2014] EWHC 816 (Fam)
Judgment date: 13 March 2014
Related
Collardeau v Fuchs: Contempt of Court [2025] EWFC 413
Poole J. An application for committal to prison for contempt of court following alleged breaches of an order made varying a final financial order.
JQ v IQ [2025] EWFC 192 (B)
Judgment date: 23 June 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/192
HHJ Vincent. A Pakistani divorce was deemed to be valid in the UK on public policy grounds and permission was granted for the wife to bring financial remedies proceedings in this jurisdiction.
This hearing concerned the
Sandeep Kumar Chugh v Latika Chugh [2025] EWFC 42
Judgment date: 04 March 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/42
Nicholas Allen KC (sitting as a deputy High Court judge). Final hearing concerning H’s application for recognition of divorce proceedings brought by H in India, and H’s challenge to the jurisdictional basis of divorce proceedings
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 3 | Winter
Related
Collardeau v Fuchs: Contempt of Court [2025] EWFC 413
Poole J. An application for committal to prison for contempt of court following alleged breaches of an order made varying a final financial order.
JQ v IQ [2025] EWFC 192 (B)
Judgment date: 23 June 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/192
HHJ Vincent. A Pakistani divorce was deemed to be valid in the UK on public policy grounds and permission was granted for the wife to bring financial remedies proceedings in this jurisdiction.
This hearing concerned the
Sandeep Kumar Chugh v Latika Chugh [2025] EWFC 42
Judgment date: 04 March 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/42
Nicholas Allen KC (sitting as a deputy High Court judge). Final hearing concerning H’s application for recognition of divorce proceedings brought by H in India, and H’s challenge to the jurisdictional basis of divorce proceedings
Latest
An End to Secrecy in Family Courts? Proposed Reforms of Contempt of Court Law That Could Lift the Threats to Sharing Information
It’s common knowledge that people involved in family court proceedings held in private are very restricted in what they can say about what’s happening. The confusing part is when someone might be in contempt of court just for talking or writing about their case, even when anonymised.
The Absent Owner – Varying Beneficial Interests Upon Separation: an Analysis of the Leading Cases
Considering TLATA cases where A and B are joint owners of a family home, the relationship breaks down, and A vacates leaving B in occupation and financially responsible for the property, and then A returns years later seeking their share of the net equity.
When Might an Arbitration Not Be Entirely Private and Confidential?
One of the great virtues of family law arbitration is its ability to provide the parties with confidentiality and privacy for their dispute. Unlike court proceedings, the parties will not face the risk of the hearing taking place in open court with curious members of the public present.