Dellal v Dellal & Ors [2015] EWHC 907 (Fam)

Judgment date: 01 April 2015

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2015/907.html

Related

Armstrong v Armstrong & Anor (Re Remedy) [2025] EWHC 2054 (Ch)

Mr Andrew Sutcliffe KC sitting as a High Court judge. Judgment considering the appropriate remedy for a claimant who had proved his proprietary estoppel claim and his alternative claim for entitlement under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) 1975 Act.

JT v RL & Anor [2025] EWHC 1335

Keehan J. Application by mother to enforce a contract in relation to a property purchased for her and the parties’ child.

Klein v Cripps Trust Corporation [2025] EWHC 688 (Fam)

Williams J. Judgment to determine reasonable financial provision under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 for the spouse and son of the deceased following limited provision for them in the Will and mismanagement of the Will by the executrix.

Read the journal

Related

Armstrong v Armstrong & Anor (Re Remedy) [2025] EWHC 2054 (Ch)

Mr Andrew Sutcliffe KC sitting as a High Court judge. Judgment considering the appropriate remedy for a claimant who had proved his proprietary estoppel claim and his alternative claim for entitlement under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) 1975 Act.

JT v RL & Anor [2025] EWHC 1335

Keehan J. Application by mother to enforce a contract in relation to a property purchased for her and the parties’ child.

Klein v Cripps Trust Corporation [2025] EWHC 688 (Fam)

Williams J. Judgment to determine reasonable financial provision under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 for the spouse and son of the deceased following limited provision for them in the Will and mismanagement of the Will by the executrix.

Latest

Cross-examination in Financial Remedy Claims

Cross-examination in Financial Remedy Claims

[2026] 2 FRJ 88. Cross-examination can have a material impact on the court’s findings of fact and determination of issues. This article is written for the occasional cross-examiner, as an aide mémoire of the rules, as a guide to doing the job well.

A Fairer End? Gaps in the Government’s Nuptial Agreement Proposals

A Fairer End? Gaps in the Government’s Nuptial Agreement Proposals

On 5 June 2026, the Government published A Fairer End to Relationships, proposing comprehensive reform of the financial consequences of both divorce and separation for unmarried couples. This piece focuses on the Government’s plan to introduce binding qualifying nuptial agreements (QNAs).

50 Years on from Martin v Martin 1976 – Are Add-backs Fit for Purpose?

50 Years on from Martin v Martin 1976 – Are Add-backs Fit for Purpose?

[2026] 2 FRJ 94. Add-backs were a useful mechanism to prevent one party’s unilateral dissipation of assets which unfairly prejudiced the non-dissipating spouse’s share. But something has gone wrong when the outcomes deviate too far from what the average person considers fair.

is curated by

The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software

EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS