Daisy Holland

Daisy Holland is undertaking pupillage at 36 Family and is currently under the supervision of Nicholas Marsh whilst she completes her financial remedies seat.

Daisy was called to the Bar after achieving Distinctions in the BVS and the GDL. To support her studies, Daisy was awarded the prestigious Lord Denning and Lord Bowen scholarships by Lincoln’s Inn.

Before commencing pupillage, Daisy served as a Judicial Assistant in the Family Division of the High Court, gaining experience across the breadth of family law with particular exposure to financial remedies, international and public children cases. She contributed to reported judgments, authored summaries of 1980 Hague Convention cases which were published on INCADAT, and produced research notes for High Court judges.

Daisy previously read BSc Politics and International Relations at the University of Bristol, graduating with a First and prizes for exceptional performance in both her second and final years. Alongside her studies, she has shown a strong commitment to client care and access to justice through voluntary and mentoring work with organisations including the Free Representation Unit and Key4Life.

Related

Read the journal

Related

Latest

An End to Secrecy in Family Courts? Proposed Reforms of Contempt of Court Law That Could Lift the Threats to Sharing Information

An End to Secrecy in Family Courts? Proposed Reforms of Contempt of Court Law That Could Lift the Threats to Sharing Information

It’s common knowledge that people involved in family court proceedings held in private are very restricted in what they can say about what’s happening. The confusing part is when someone might be in contempt of court just for talking or writing about their case, even when anonymised.

The Absent Owner – Varying Beneficial Interests Upon Separation: an Analysis of the Leading Cases

The Absent Owner – Varying Beneficial Interests Upon Separation: an Analysis of the Leading Cases

Considering TLATA cases where A and B are joint owners of a family home, the relationship breaks down, and A vacates leaving B in occupation and financially responsible for the property, and then A returns years later seeking their share of the net equity.

When Might an Arbitration Not Be Entirely Private and Confidential?

When Might an Arbitration Not Be Entirely Private and Confidential?

One of the great virtues of family law arbitration is its ability to provide the parties with confidentiality and privacy for their dispute. Unlike court proceedings, the parties will not face the risk of the hearing taking place in open court with curious members of the public present.

is curated by

The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software

EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS