Dadourian Group v Simms [2006] EWCA Civ 399
Judgment date: 11 April 2006
Related
Culligan v Culligan (No 3) (Terms of Order) [2025] EWFC 186
MacDonald J. The court determined the terms of an order following a final hearing in January, which saw an equal division of the matrimonial assets following a 40-year marriage, including Wells sharing.
JB v RB [2025] EWFC 194 (B)
District Judge Akers. This case involved final financial remedy proceedings between the Wife and the Husband following the breakdown of a long marriage. The dispute centred on the division of the former family home, spousal maintenance, and the classification of certain debts as ‘soft loans’.
Re HMP [2025] EWCA Civ 824
Judgment date: 1 July 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2025/824
Carr LCJ, King LJ and Warby LJ. The Court of Appeal allowed an appeal against a disclosure order in concluded care proceedings, confirming that the open justice principle did not extend to media applications unconnected to
Read the journal


Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 2 | Summer
Related
Culligan v Culligan (No 3) (Terms of Order) [2025] EWFC 186
MacDonald J. The court determined the terms of an order following a final hearing in January, which saw an equal division of the matrimonial assets following a 40-year marriage, including Wells sharing.
JB v RB [2025] EWFC 194 (B)
District Judge Akers. This case involved final financial remedy proceedings between the Wife and the Husband following the breakdown of a long marriage. The dispute centred on the division of the former family home, spousal maintenance, and the classification of certain debts as ‘soft loans’.
Re HMP [2025] EWCA Civ 824
Judgment date: 1 July 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2025/824
Carr LCJ, King LJ and Warby LJ. The Court of Appeal allowed an appeal against a disclosure order in concluded care proceedings, confirming that the open justice principle did not extend to media applications unconnected to
Latest
Final Reflections on Standish: Was It All Worthwhile?
If asked, Mr Standish may say that three rounds of litigation, with another to follow, were worth it – Mrs Standish, perhaps not. But for lawyers, with many questions left unanswered, and a feeling that the opportunity to settle the law on matrimonialisation with clarity and certainty has passed us by,

OS v DT and Post-Separation Income: Fairness Trumps Inflexibility
In ‘Post-Separation Income: Has Rossi Survived Waggott and Standish?’ (5 February 2025), Nicholas Allen KC considered the potential impact of Waggott v Waggott [2018] 2 FLR 406 on the argument that income (or the assets or capital generated therefrom) earned in or referable to the first 12 months post-separation should

A Priceless Inheritance: Family Law, Open Justice and the Rule of Law
“The traditional law, that English justice must be administered openly in the face of all men, is an almost priceless inheritance” Earl Loreburn in Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417
Sir Nicholas Mostyn presented on this topic at the Bar Council’s law reform lecture 2025, on 2 July 2025.