Brooks v Brooks [1996] AC 375
Judgment date: 29 June 1995
Related
HO v TL [2023] EWFC 215
Judgment date: 01 December 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2023/215
Peel J. Final hearing. Guidance on factors relevant to valuing a private company; accessibility of extricating money from trusts per Charman; and extent of matrimonialisation of H’s extra-marital financial contributions.
H aged 49. W aged 56
EK v DK & Ors [2023] EWHC 1829 (Fam)
Judgment date: 11 May 2023
https://assets.caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/1829/ewhc_fam_2023_1829.pdf
Mr Justice Francis. Application by W to set aside consent order dated March 2018 on basis of H’s non-disclosure.
This was a long marriage with three teenage/young adult
Rose v Rose & Ors [2022] EWFC 192
Judgment date: 25 November 2022
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2022/192.html
His Honour Judge Booth (sitting as a Judge of the High Court pursuant to s 9 SCA 1981).
How should the court ‘deal with a respondent husband who has been dishonest throughout, has failed
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 2 | Summer
Related
HO v TL [2023] EWFC 215
Judgment date: 01 December 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2023/215
Peel J. Final hearing. Guidance on factors relevant to valuing a private company; accessibility of extricating money from trusts per Charman; and extent of matrimonialisation of H’s extra-marital financial contributions.
H aged 49. W aged 56
EK v DK & Ors [2023] EWHC 1829 (Fam)
Judgment date: 11 May 2023
https://assets.caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/1829/ewhc_fam_2023_1829.pdf
Mr Justice Francis. Application by W to set aside consent order dated March 2018 on basis of H’s non-disclosure.
This was a long marriage with three teenage/young adult
Rose v Rose & Ors [2022] EWFC 192
Judgment date: 25 November 2022
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2022/192.html
His Honour Judge Booth (sitting as a Judge of the High Court pursuant to s 9 SCA 1981).
How should the court ‘deal with a respondent husband who has been dishonest throughout, has failed
Latest
The Astonishing Fate of Scott v Scott (1911-1913)
Secrecy in family cases from the Court for Divorce and Matrimonial Causes (1858) to the Financial Remedies Court (2024)
The Consequences of Late Service of an N260 for Summary Assessment of Costs: Prejudice and Proportionality
The requirement to serve a statement of costs (Form N260) for the purposes of summary assessment of costs is set out in CPR PD 44 para 9.5. But what are the consequences of a breach of the rule to serve the statement of costs not less than 24 hours before the start of the hearing?
Is It Time for the Conclusions in Waggott to Be Reconsidered?
There is arguably a far greater understanding now than there was even as recently as 2018 of domestic abuse and the wide-reaching and long-lasting impact that it can have. Does this mean it is time for the Court of Appeal to reconsider the conclusions it reached in Waggott?