Brooks v Brooks [1996] AC 375
Judgment date: 29 June 1995
Related
HO v TL [2023] EWFC 215
Judgment date: 01 December 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2023/215
Peel J. Final hearing. Guidance on factors relevant to valuing a private company; accessibility of extricating money from trusts per Charman; and extent of matrimonialisation of H’s extra-marital financial contributions.
H aged 49. W aged 56
EK v DK & Ors [2023] EWHC 1829 (Fam)
Judgment date: 11 May 2023
https://assets.caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/1829/ewhc_fam_2023_1829.pdf
Mr Justice Francis. Application by W to set aside consent order dated March 2018 on basis of H’s non-disclosure.
This was a long marriage with three teenage/young adult
Rose v Rose & Ors [2022] EWFC 192
Judgment date: 25 November 2022
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2022/192.html
His Honour Judge Booth (sitting as a Judge of the High Court pursuant to s 9 SCA 1981).
How should the court ‘deal with a respondent husband who has been dishonest throughout, has failed
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring
Related
HO v TL [2023] EWFC 215
Judgment date: 01 December 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2023/215
Peel J. Final hearing. Guidance on factors relevant to valuing a private company; accessibility of extricating money from trusts per Charman; and extent of matrimonialisation of H’s extra-marital financial contributions.
H aged 49. W aged 56
EK v DK & Ors [2023] EWHC 1829 (Fam)
Judgment date: 11 May 2023
https://assets.caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/1829/ewhc_fam_2023_1829.pdf
Mr Justice Francis. Application by W to set aside consent order dated March 2018 on basis of H’s non-disclosure.
This was a long marriage with three teenage/young adult
Rose v Rose & Ors [2022] EWFC 192
Judgment date: 25 November 2022
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2022/192.html
His Honour Judge Booth (sitting as a Judge of the High Court pursuant to s 9 SCA 1981).
How should the court ‘deal with a respondent husband who has been dishonest throughout, has failed
Latest
Mazur in the Court of Appeal: the Judgment That Saved Half the Profession from Accidental Criminality
The Court of Appeal rewrites the landscape of ‘conduct of litigation’ – Mazur & Stuart v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP & Ors [2026] EWCA Civ 369.
Portals: Bringing It All Together
Tips and tricks on using the digital court portals from a member of the stakeholder group for the profession, including how to avoid the double login, when to denote documents as confidential, and how to prompt a response from the court.
FRJ – ‘Well, He (or She) Didn’t Ask!’ – the Impact of Non-Disclosure When the Question Isn’t Asked
Is it a shield to non-disclosure by one party during financial remedy proceedings if the other party could (and perhaps should) have asked? The duty on parties to give full and frank financial disclosure is not merely a private obligation between them; it is a duty to the court.