BJ v MJ (Financial Remedy: Overseas Trusts) [2011] EWHC 2708 (Fam), [2012] 1 FLR 667
Judgment date: 27 October 2011
Related
TR v ST (Letters of Request) [2026] EWHC 1785 (Fam)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2026/1785
WK v HN [2026] EWFC 169 (B)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/169
50 Years on from Martin v Martin 1976 – Are Add-backs Fit for Purpose?
[2026] 2 FRJ 94. Add-backs were a useful mechanism to prevent one party’s unilateral dissipation of assets which unfairly prejudiced the non-dissipating spouse’s share. But something has gone wrong when the outcomes deviate too far from what the average person considers fair.
Related
TR v ST (Letters of Request) [2026] EWHC 1785 (Fam)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2026/1785
WK v HN [2026] EWFC 169 (B)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/169
50 Years on from Martin v Martin 1976 – Are Add-backs Fit for Purpose?
[2026] 2 FRJ 94. Add-backs were a useful mechanism to prevent one party’s unilateral dissipation of assets which unfairly prejudiced the non-dissipating spouse’s share. But something has gone wrong when the outcomes deviate too far from what the average person considers fair.
Latest
My Time on the Family Procedure Rule Committee
The Vice Chair of the FRJ Editorial Board talks about his six years as a barrister member of the Family Procedure Rule Committee.
Intervenor Cases: Preliminary Issue Hearing or FDR (or NCDR)?
Should case management decisions in intervenor cases place greater focus on the opportunities presented by an FDR or NCDR taking place prior to a preliminary issue hearing?
Standish One Year On – Is There Agreement As to What It Means?
The question of whether property that is matrimonial property has as a consequence to be shared equally has become one of the main areas of debate in the first instance decisions over the last year.