Barrett v Enfield London Borough Council [2001] AC 550
Judgment date: 17 June 1999
Related
JT v RL & Anor [2025] EWHC 1335
Keehan J. Application by mother to enforce a contract in relation to a property purchased for her and the parties’ child.
M v B [2025] EWFC 182
Judgment date: 25 June 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/182
Sir Jonathan Cohen (sitting as a judge of the High Court). Financial remedy proceedings considering the court’s power to strike out applications under FPR 4.4, having regard to the effect of FPR 9.9A.
The
Ogbedo v Oghenerume-Taiga [2024] EWHC 3193 (Fam)
Judgment date: 12 December 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/3193
Sir Jonathan Cohen. This is a successful application of NO (herein referred to as ‘F’) to strike out MT’s (herein referred to as ‘M’) application for nullity pursuant to FPR 4.4 on the basis
Read the journal


Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 2 | Summer
Related
JT v RL & Anor [2025] EWHC 1335
Keehan J. Application by mother to enforce a contract in relation to a property purchased for her and the parties’ child.
M v B [2025] EWFC 182
Judgment date: 25 June 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/182
Sir Jonathan Cohen (sitting as a judge of the High Court). Financial remedy proceedings considering the court’s power to strike out applications under FPR 4.4, having regard to the effect of FPR 9.9A.
The
Ogbedo v Oghenerume-Taiga [2024] EWHC 3193 (Fam)
Judgment date: 12 December 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/3193
Sir Jonathan Cohen. This is a successful application of NO (herein referred to as ‘F’) to strike out MT’s (herein referred to as ‘M’) application for nullity pursuant to FPR 4.4 on the basis
Latest

Open Justice in the Modern Age
A guest lecture delivered on Tuesday, 7 October 2025, at 6pm, at George Town, Grand Cayman.

Applied Theatre and the Advocacy Gap in Financial Remedies
Closing the gap between legal recognition and judicial persuasion.

War (of the Roses) – What Is It Good For?
The release of a new film has sparked a wave of commentary from the press and family lawyers alike. It shows that bloody mindedness and divorce are a timeless combination. Contains spoilers!