Cases Setting Aside Orders (Including Barder Applications) Open in Akhmedova v Akhmedov [2020] EWHC 2235 Judgment date: 14 August 2020https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2020/2235.html Related K v K [2026] EWFC 83 (B) DJ Parker’s decision emphasises the importance of the court transcript where there is a dispute as to what was said by the judge. Ultimately H’s application to set aside a final order by consent failed because H was wrong; the FDR judge had not given him a 28-day cooling off period. Silberschmidt v Richards [2025] EWHC 2841 (Fam) Poole J. Husband’s appeal against setting aside of final consent order for fraudulent non-disclosure dismissed; wife’s delay not determinative. Noah Silberschmidt v Nanette Richards [2025] EWHC 2841 (Fam) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2025/2841?query=Silberschmidt+Richards+%5B2025%5D+EWHC+2841 Read the journal Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring Open in Related K v K [2026] EWFC 83 (B) DJ Parker’s decision emphasises the importance of the court transcript where there is a dispute as to what was said by the judge. Ultimately H’s application to set aside a final order by consent failed because H was wrong; the FDR judge had not given him a 28-day cooling off period. Silberschmidt v Richards [2025] EWHC 2841 (Fam) Poole J. Husband’s appeal against setting aside of final consent order for fraudulent non-disclosure dismissed; wife’s delay not determinative. Noah Silberschmidt v Nanette Richards [2025] EWHC 2841 (Fam) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2025/2841?query=Silberschmidt+Richards+%5B2025%5D+EWHC+2841 Latest Keep Calm and Carry on: A v M in a Wells World [2026] 2 FRJ 114. This article takes a closer look at how Carry was shared in the cases of A v M and ED v AP, and the different approaches adopted for its assessment. It concludes by proposing an alternative method by which Carry can be shared when the timing of future receipts is unknown. Thwaite – The Jury Remains Out [2026] 2 FRJ 99. Does the Thwaite jurisdiction still exist? If it does, what is its appropriate scope? The Court of Appeal will be required to decide. Cross-examination in Financial Remedy Claims [2026] 2 FRJ 88. Cross-examination can have a material impact on the court’s findings of fact and determination of issues. This article is written for the occasional cross-examiner, as an aide mémoire of the rules, as a guide to doing the job well. is curated by The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS
K v K [2026] EWFC 83 (B) DJ Parker’s decision emphasises the importance of the court transcript where there is a dispute as to what was said by the judge. Ultimately H’s application to set aside a final order by consent failed because H was wrong; the FDR judge had not given him a 28-day cooling off period.
Silberschmidt v Richards [2025] EWHC 2841 (Fam) Poole J. Husband’s appeal against setting aside of final consent order for fraudulent non-disclosure dismissed; wife’s delay not determinative.
Noah Silberschmidt v Nanette Richards [2025] EWHC 2841 (Fam) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2025/2841?query=Silberschmidt+Richards+%5B2025%5D+EWHC+2841
K v K [2026] EWFC 83 (B) DJ Parker’s decision emphasises the importance of the court transcript where there is a dispute as to what was said by the judge. Ultimately H’s application to set aside a final order by consent failed because H was wrong; the FDR judge had not given him a 28-day cooling off period.
Silberschmidt v Richards [2025] EWHC 2841 (Fam) Poole J. Husband’s appeal against setting aside of final consent order for fraudulent non-disclosure dismissed; wife’s delay not determinative.
Noah Silberschmidt v Nanette Richards [2025] EWHC 2841 (Fam) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2025/2841?query=Silberschmidt+Richards+%5B2025%5D+EWHC+2841
Keep Calm and Carry on: A v M in a Wells World [2026] 2 FRJ 114. This article takes a closer look at how Carry was shared in the cases of A v M and ED v AP, and the different approaches adopted for its assessment. It concludes by proposing an alternative method by which Carry can be shared when the timing of future receipts is unknown.
Thwaite – The Jury Remains Out [2026] 2 FRJ 99. Does the Thwaite jurisdiction still exist? If it does, what is its appropriate scope? The Court of Appeal will be required to decide.
Cross-examination in Financial Remedy Claims [2026] 2 FRJ 88. Cross-examination can have a material impact on the court’s findings of fact and determination of issues. This article is written for the occasional cross-examiner, as an aide mémoire of the rules, as a guide to doing the job well.