AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9

Judgment date: 04 February 2021

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2021/9.html

Related

KMR v AER [2026] EWFC 10 (B)

DDJ Benjamin Rose. Judgment considering high-value assets, non-disclosure, jurisdictional questions, issues surrounding the validity of a nuptial settlement and general conduct of proceedings.

All Change or More of the Same? Housing Needs and Notional Property Down Under in light of Amendments to the Family Law Act 1975

[2026] 1 FRJ 55. Considering two aspects of the 2025 amendments to the Australian Family Law Act 1975: the greater recognition given to the needs of a party who has the care of a child to provide housing, and the removal of notional property or addbacks in the balance sheet in property division.

AN v NT [2025] EWFC 456

Peel J. How can a party obtain without-notice injunctive relief pending leave under Part III MFPA 1984 following Potanina v Potanin?

Read the journal

Related

KMR v AER [2026] EWFC 10 (B)

DDJ Benjamin Rose. Judgment considering high-value assets, non-disclosure, jurisdictional questions, issues surrounding the validity of a nuptial settlement and general conduct of proceedings.

All Change or More of the Same? Housing Needs and Notional Property Down Under in light of Amendments to the Family Law Act 1975

[2026] 1 FRJ 55. Considering two aspects of the 2025 amendments to the Australian Family Law Act 1975: the greater recognition given to the needs of a party who has the care of a child to provide housing, and the removal of notional property or addbacks in the balance sheet in property division.

AN v NT [2025] EWFC 456

Peel J. How can a party obtain without-notice injunctive relief pending leave under Part III MFPA 1984 following Potanina v Potanin?

Latest

How are family lawyers really approaching legal research and technology?

Class Legal is reviewing its products, resources, and customer behaviour to better understand what practitioners need.

Interview with Richard Sax

Interview with Richard Sax

On 11 February 2026 there was a celebratory lunch with the past recipients of Resolution’s John Cornwell Lifetime Achievement Award, organised by David Emmerson, who here interviews Richard Sax.

The Curious Case of CA 1989 Schedule 1 paragraph 2(3)

The Curious Case of CA 1989 Schedule 1 paragraph 2(3)

Paragraph 1 of CA 1989 Schedule 1 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief against parents’. Paragraph 2 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief for persons over eighteen’. As recent cases have demonstrated this structure causes complications.

is curated by

The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software

EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS