Address for litigants in person to send documents in financial remedies proceedings for scanning on to Portal
Related
FPR PD 27A and Procedural Ambush – A Litigant in Person’s Perspective
This article, the anonymous writer explains, is not about abuse during the marriage, but rather the abuse hidden in court procedure, in particular how the habitual disregard of FPR PD 27A1 paves the way to procedural ambush, why this matters, and what must change in order to safeguard justice.
Family BarLink: The CFC Pro Bono Duty Scheme
A new pro bono scheme assisting litigants in person in family proceedings at the Central Family Court – background
As we are all acutely aware, restrictions in the provision of legal aid following the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 have resulted in a sharp increase in the
Financial Remedy Court Organogram - November 2025
The Financial Remedies Court Organogram - November 2025The Financial Remedies Court Organogram - November 2025.pdf1 MBdownload-circle
Related
FPR PD 27A and Procedural Ambush – A Litigant in Person’s Perspective
This article, the anonymous writer explains, is not about abuse during the marriage, but rather the abuse hidden in court procedure, in particular how the habitual disregard of FPR PD 27A1 paves the way to procedural ambush, why this matters, and what must change in order to safeguard justice.
Family BarLink: The CFC Pro Bono Duty Scheme
A new pro bono scheme assisting litigants in person in family proceedings at the Central Family Court – background
As we are all acutely aware, restrictions in the provision of legal aid following the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 have resulted in a sharp increase in the
Financial Remedy Court Organogram - November 2025
The Financial Remedies Court Organogram - November 2025The Financial Remedies Court Organogram - November 2025.pdf1 MBdownload-circle
Latest
An End to Secrecy in Family Courts? Proposed Reforms of Contempt of Court Law That Could Lift the Threats to Sharing Information
It’s common knowledge that people involved in family court proceedings held in private are very restricted in what they can say about what’s happening. The confusing part is when someone might be in contempt of court just for talking or writing about their case, even when anonymised.
The Absent Owner – Varying Beneficial Interests Upon Separation: an Analysis of the Leading Cases
Considering TLATA cases where A and B are joint owners of a family home, the relationship breaks down, and A vacates leaving B in occupation and financially responsible for the property, and then A returns years later seeking their share of the net equity.
When Might an Arbitration Not Be Entirely Private and Confidential?
One of the great virtues of family law arbitration is its ability to provide the parties with confidentiality and privacy for their dispute. Unlike court proceedings, the parties will not face the risk of the hearing taking place in open court with curious members of the public present.