AB v CD [2016] EWHC 2482 (Fam)

Judgment date: 11 October 2016

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2016/2482.html

Related

KMR v AER [2026] EWFC 10 (B)

DDJ Benjamin Rose. Judgment considering high-value assets, non-disclosure, jurisdictional questions, issues surrounding the validity of a nuptial settlement and general conduct of proceedings.

K v K [2026] EWFC 83 (B)

DJ Parker’s decision emphasises the importance of the court transcript where there is a dispute as to what was said by the judge. Ultimately H’s application to set aside a final order by consent failed because H was wrong; the FDR judge had not given him a 28-day cooling off period.

Hammond v Herrington Carmichael LLP [2026] EWHC 701 (SCCO)

Costs Judge Whalan. Unsuccessful application by the claimant for a s 70 Solicitors Act 1974 assessment of the invoices delivered by the defendant law firm. Invoices were Interim Statute Bills, and no special circumstances were found to justify assessment by the court.

Read the journal

Related

KMR v AER [2026] EWFC 10 (B)

DDJ Benjamin Rose. Judgment considering high-value assets, non-disclosure, jurisdictional questions, issues surrounding the validity of a nuptial settlement and general conduct of proceedings.

K v K [2026] EWFC 83 (B)

DJ Parker’s decision emphasises the importance of the court transcript where there is a dispute as to what was said by the judge. Ultimately H’s application to set aside a final order by consent failed because H was wrong; the FDR judge had not given him a 28-day cooling off period.

Hammond v Herrington Carmichael LLP [2026] EWHC 701 (SCCO)

Costs Judge Whalan. Unsuccessful application by the claimant for a s 70 Solicitors Act 1974 assessment of the invoices delivered by the defendant law firm. Invoices were Interim Statute Bills, and no special circumstances were found to justify assessment by the court.

Latest

Keep Calm and Carry on: A v M in a Wells World

Keep Calm and Carry on: A v M in a Wells World

[2026] 2 FRJ 114. This article takes a closer look at how Carry was shared in the cases of A v M and ED v AP, and the different approaches adopted for its assessment. It concludes by proposing an alternative method by which Carry can be shared when the timing of future receipts is unknown.

Thwaite – The Jury Remains Out

Thwaite – The Jury Remains Out

[2026] 2 FRJ 99. Does the Thwaite jurisdiction still exist? If it does, what is its appropriate scope? The Court of Appeal will be required to decide.

Cross-examination in Financial Remedy Claims

Cross-examination in Financial Remedy Claims

[2026] 2 FRJ 88. Cross-examination can have a material impact on the court’s findings of fact and determination of issues. This article is written for the occasional cross-examiner, as an aide mémoire of the rules, as a guide to doing the job well.

is curated by

The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software

EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS