AAZ v BBZ & Ors [2016] EWHC 3349 (Fam)
Judgment date: 20 December 2016
Related
TYB v CAR (Non-Disclosure) (No 2) [2025] EWFC 263 (B)
DDJ David Hodson. Final hearing concerning maintenance for wife in a case with serious non-disclosure.
BC v BC [2025] EWFC 236
Peel J. Save for four specific matters, parties cannot refer to what happened at the pFDR. The Financial Remedies Court – Primary Principles paragraph 8 issued by Mostyn J and HHJ Hess goes too far by saying that the court should be told that offers were made and that an was indication given.
Abigail Laura Williams v Andrew John Williams [2024] EWFC 275
Judgment date: 06 August 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/275
Final order of Moor J in financial remedy proceedings involving a husband who had continually breached court orders, failed to attend hearings, and provided unreliable and ‘demonstrably untrue’ evidence.
Background
H (56) and W (59) married in
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 3 | Winter
Related
TYB v CAR (Non-Disclosure) (No 2) [2025] EWFC 263 (B)
DDJ David Hodson. Final hearing concerning maintenance for wife in a case with serious non-disclosure.
BC v BC [2025] EWFC 236
Peel J. Save for four specific matters, parties cannot refer to what happened at the pFDR. The Financial Remedies Court – Primary Principles paragraph 8 issued by Mostyn J and HHJ Hess goes too far by saying that the court should be told that offers were made and that an was indication given.
Abigail Laura Williams v Andrew John Williams [2024] EWFC 275
Judgment date: 06 August 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/275
Final order of Moor J in financial remedy proceedings involving a husband who had continually breached court orders, failed to attend hearings, and provided unreliable and ‘demonstrably untrue’ evidence.
Background
H (56) and W (59) married in
Latest
Delaying Departure? Domicile in Divorce Cases
[2026] 1 FRJ 16. In Ramana v Kist Ramana [2025] EWCA Civ 1022, [2025] 4 WLR 120 the Court of Appeal was concerned with the question of how a domicile of choice may be lost. This article explores the arguments made at the hearing, the court’s decision and reasoning, and the likely implications.
Stop! In the Name of the LSA: Why Your Favourite Legal Exec Can’t Touch That Form A after Mazur and XX v GH
HHJ Farquhar was confronted with the practical consequences of Mazur for family law cases. The issue arose when Family Law Partners, a highly respected specialist family law firm, sought an exemption permitting their senior Chartered Legal Executive, Ms Lisa Burton Durham, to conduct litigation.
Book Review: Financial Remedies Handbook 2025
[2026] 1 FRJ 74. Rhys Taylor reviews the 15th edition of Financial Remedies Handbook 2026, by District Judge Sophie Harrison, published by LexisNexis, and says every financial remedy lawyer should have it by their side.