Cases Setting Aside Orders (Including Barder Applications) Open in A v B [2017] EWFC B9 Judgment date: 03 February 2017http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2017/B9.html Related K v K [2026] EWFC 83 (B) DJ Parker’s decision emphasises the importance of the court transcript where there is a dispute as to what was said by the judge. Ultimately H’s application to set aside a final order by consent failed because H was wrong; the FDR judge had not given him a 28-day cooling off period. Silberschmidt v Richards [2025] EWHC 2841 (Fam) Poole J. Husband’s appeal against setting aside of final consent order for fraudulent non-disclosure dismissed; wife’s delay not determinative. Noah Silberschmidt v Nanette Richards [2025] EWHC 2841 (Fam) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2025/2841?query=Silberschmidt+Richards+%5B2025%5D+EWHC+2841 Read the journal Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring Open in Related K v K [2026] EWFC 83 (B) DJ Parker’s decision emphasises the importance of the court transcript where there is a dispute as to what was said by the judge. Ultimately H’s application to set aside a final order by consent failed because H was wrong; the FDR judge had not given him a 28-day cooling off period. Silberschmidt v Richards [2025] EWHC 2841 (Fam) Poole J. Husband’s appeal against setting aside of final consent order for fraudulent non-disclosure dismissed; wife’s delay not determinative. Noah Silberschmidt v Nanette Richards [2025] EWHC 2841 (Fam) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2025/2841?query=Silberschmidt+Richards+%5B2025%5D+EWHC+2841 Latest Summary of Government’s Consultation on Fairer End to Relationships Graeme Fraser summarises the Government’s Consultation on Fairer End to Relationships. The Fact a Without Prejudice Offer Has Been Made: Admissible or Privileged from Disclosure? It is trite law to state that the contents of without prejudice negotiations cannot be referred to openly. But what about the fact that such negotiations have taken place? Perhaps surprisingly this question does not have a straightforward answer. How are family lawyers really approaching legal research and technology? Class Legal is reviewing its products, resources, and customer behaviour to better understand what practitioners need. is curated by The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS
K v K [2026] EWFC 83 (B) DJ Parker’s decision emphasises the importance of the court transcript where there is a dispute as to what was said by the judge. Ultimately H’s application to set aside a final order by consent failed because H was wrong; the FDR judge had not given him a 28-day cooling off period.
Silberschmidt v Richards [2025] EWHC 2841 (Fam) Poole J. Husband’s appeal against setting aside of final consent order for fraudulent non-disclosure dismissed; wife’s delay not determinative.
Noah Silberschmidt v Nanette Richards [2025] EWHC 2841 (Fam) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2025/2841?query=Silberschmidt+Richards+%5B2025%5D+EWHC+2841
K v K [2026] EWFC 83 (B) DJ Parker’s decision emphasises the importance of the court transcript where there is a dispute as to what was said by the judge. Ultimately H’s application to set aside a final order by consent failed because H was wrong; the FDR judge had not given him a 28-day cooling off period.
Silberschmidt v Richards [2025] EWHC 2841 (Fam) Poole J. Husband’s appeal against setting aside of final consent order for fraudulent non-disclosure dismissed; wife’s delay not determinative.
Noah Silberschmidt v Nanette Richards [2025] EWHC 2841 (Fam) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2025/2841?query=Silberschmidt+Richards+%5B2025%5D+EWHC+2841
Summary of Government’s Consultation on Fairer End to Relationships Graeme Fraser summarises the Government’s Consultation on Fairer End to Relationships.
The Fact a Without Prejudice Offer Has Been Made: Admissible or Privileged from Disclosure? It is trite law to state that the contents of without prejudice negotiations cannot be referred to openly. But what about the fact that such negotiations have taken place? Perhaps surprisingly this question does not have a straightforward answer.
How are family lawyers really approaching legal research and technology? Class Legal is reviewing its products, resources, and customer behaviour to better understand what practitioners need.