Young v Young [2013] EWHC 3637 (Fam)
Judgment date: 22 November 2013
Related
Reid-Roberts & Anor v Mei-Lin & Anor [2026] EWHC 49 (Ch)
Cawson J. Appeal and cross-appeal concerning H’s beneficial interest in the matrimonial home. Cawson J found that H had not transferred his beneficial interest to W, but that sale of the property should be deferred.
Maxine Reid-Roberts & Anor v Hsiao Mei-Lin & Anor [2026] EWHC 49 (Ch)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2026/49
Collardeau v Fuchs: Contempt of Court [2025] EWFC 413
Poole J. An application for committal to prison for contempt of court following alleged breaches of an order made varying a final financial order.
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring
Related
Reid-Roberts & Anor v Mei-Lin & Anor [2026] EWHC 49 (Ch)
Cawson J. Appeal and cross-appeal concerning H’s beneficial interest in the matrimonial home. Cawson J found that H had not transferred his beneficial interest to W, but that sale of the property should be deferred.
Maxine Reid-Roberts & Anor v Hsiao Mei-Lin & Anor [2026] EWHC 49 (Ch)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2026/49
Collardeau v Fuchs: Contempt of Court [2025] EWFC 413
Poole J. An application for committal to prison for contempt of court following alleged breaches of an order made varying a final financial order.
Latest
The Curious Case of CA 1989 Schedule 1 paragraph 2(3)
Paragraph 1 of CA 1989 Schedule 1 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief against parents’. Paragraph 2 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief for persons over eighteen’. As recent cases have demonstrated this structure causes complications.
The 2026 FRC Guide: What Practitioners Need to Know
Watch the recording of ‘The 2026 FRC Guide: What Practitioners Need to Know’, first broadcast on Wednesday 6th May 2026 with the authors of the new FRC Guide - HHJ Edward Hess, Nicholas Allen KC, Michael Allum, Lily Mottahedan and Rhys Taylor
Mazur in the Court of Appeal: the Judgment That Saved Half the Profession from Accidental Criminality
The Court of Appeal rewrites the landscape of ‘conduct of litigation’ – Mazur & Stuart v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP & Ors [2026] EWCA Civ 369.