Work v Gray [2017] EWCA Civ 270
Judgment date: 11 April 2017
Related
Special Contributions: ‘Genius’, Guesswork and Gender Discrimination
This article revisits the contested terrain of ‘special contribution’, and questions whether it retains any legitimate role in contemporary financial remedy jurisprudence. It argues that the concept is both theoretically discriminatory and practically uncertain.
SS v IS [2023] EWHC 1544 (Fam)
Judgment date: 14 June 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/1544
Roberts J. Final hearing in financial remedy proceedings with issues around spousal maintenance, offshore trusts and non-matrimonial assets.
Background
The parties met as students in 2003 in Russia and married in 2004. They had essentially no
DR v UG [2023] EWFC 68
Judgment date: 05 April 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2023/68
Moor J. The parties were Danish. H was aged 57 and W aged 49. Children aged 18, 16, and 16. Married 2004, marriage broke down in 2019.
H was CEO of a drugs manufacturer but staged a
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 2 | Summer
Related
Special Contributions: ‘Genius’, Guesswork and Gender Discrimination
This article revisits the contested terrain of ‘special contribution’, and questions whether it retains any legitimate role in contemporary financial remedy jurisprudence. It argues that the concept is both theoretically discriminatory and practically uncertain.
SS v IS [2023] EWHC 1544 (Fam)
Judgment date: 14 June 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/1544
Roberts J. Final hearing in financial remedy proceedings with issues around spousal maintenance, offshore trusts and non-matrimonial assets.
Background
The parties met as students in 2003 in Russia and married in 2004. They had essentially no
DR v UG [2023] EWFC 68
Judgment date: 05 April 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2023/68
Moor J. The parties were Danish. H was aged 57 and W aged 49. Children aged 18, 16, and 16. Married 2004, marriage broke down in 2019.
H was CEO of a drugs manufacturer but staged a
Latest
My Time on the Family Procedure Rule Committee
The Vice Chair of the FRJ Editorial Board talks about his six years as a barrister member of the Family Procedure Rule Committee.
Intervenor Cases: Preliminary Issue Hearing or FDR (or NCDR)?
Should case management decisions in intervenor cases place greater focus on the opportunities presented by an FDR or NCDR taking place prior to a preliminary issue hearing?
Standish One Year On – Is There Agreement As to What It Means?
The question of whether property that is matrimonial property has as a consequence to be shared equally has become one of the main areas of debate in the first instance decisions over the last year.