Work v Gray [2017] EWCA Civ 270

Judgment date: 11 April 2017

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2017/270.html

Related

Special Contributions: ‘Genius’, Guesswork and Gender Discrimination

This article revisits the contested terrain of ‘special contribution’, and questions whether it retains any legitimate role in contemporary financial remedy jurisprudence. It argues that the concept is both theoretically discriminatory and practically uncertain.

SS v IS [2023] EWHC 1544 (Fam)

Judgment date: 14 June 2023 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/1544 Roberts J. Final hearing in financial remedy proceedings with issues around spousal maintenance, offshore trusts and non-matrimonial assets. Background The parties met as students in 2003 in Russia and married in 2004. They had essentially no

DR v UG [2023] EWFC 68

Judgment date: 05 April 2023 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2023/68 Moor J. The parties were Danish. H was aged 57 and W aged 49. Children aged 18, 16, and 16. Married 2004, marriage broke down in 2019. H was CEO of a drugs manufacturer but staged a

Read the journal

Related

Special Contributions: ‘Genius’, Guesswork and Gender Discrimination

This article revisits the contested terrain of ‘special contribution’, and questions whether it retains any legitimate role in contemporary financial remedy jurisprudence. It argues that the concept is both theoretically discriminatory and practically uncertain.

SS v IS [2023] EWHC 1544 (Fam)

Judgment date: 14 June 2023 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/1544 Roberts J. Final hearing in financial remedy proceedings with issues around spousal maintenance, offshore trusts and non-matrimonial assets. Background The parties met as students in 2003 in Russia and married in 2004. They had essentially no

DR v UG [2023] EWFC 68

Judgment date: 05 April 2023 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2023/68 Moor J. The parties were Danish. H was aged 57 and W aged 49. Children aged 18, 16, and 16. Married 2004, marriage broke down in 2019. H was CEO of a drugs manufacturer but staged a

Latest

Portals: Bringing It All Together

Portals: Bringing It All Together

Tips and tricks on using the digital court portals from a member of the stakeholder group for the profession, including how to avoid the double login, when to denote documents as confidential, and how to prompt a response from the court.

FRJ – ‘Well, He (or She) Didn’t Ask!’ – the Impact of Non-Disclosure When the Question Isn’t Asked

FRJ – ‘Well, He (or She) Didn’t Ask!’ – the Impact of Non-Disclosure When the Question Isn’t Asked

Is it a shield to non-disclosure by one party during financial remedy proceedings if the other party could (and perhaps should) have asked? The duty on parties to give full and frank financial disclosure is not merely a private obligation between them; it is a duty to the court.

The Reluctant Pension Credit Member

The Reluctant Pension Credit Member

[2026] 1 FRJ 39. In the case of AP v TP [2025] EWFC 190 (B) a financial remedy order was made by consent, following an FDR, which included a pension sharing order in W’s favour. Difficulties began when W failed to provide the necessary information to permit the pension share to be implemented.

is curated by

The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software

EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS