DOWNLOAD ISSUE 3 - November 2022 (PDF)
Financial Remedies Journal Issue 3 Digitalfinancial-remedies-journal-issue-3-digital.pdf27 MBdownload-circle
Journal
Chair's Column (Winter 2022)
I am delighted to commend to you the third issue of the Financial Remedies Journal (FRJ) which, without doubt, sustains the standards set in the earlier issues for providing information and debate on the big subjects topical in the financial remedies world. Amongst other riches, readers will enjoy a thoughtful
PAG2: The Continuing Work of the Pension Advisory Group
In July 2019, the Pension Advisory Group (PAG) was pleased to publish its report A Guide to the Treatment of Pensions on Divorce, partially funded by the Nuffield Foundation.[[1]] This publication was expressly endorsed in the Foreword by the President of the Family Division and had the professional sponsorship
‘For Reasons Which Are Not Fanciful’ – Daniels v Walker Applications in Financial Remedy Cases
More than 22 years after it was decided, there remains no reported decision in a financial remedies case in which a court has provided guidance in relation to whether or not to grant a so-called Daniels v Walker [2000] EWCA Civ 508, [2000] 1 WLR 1382 application for the instruction
Someone! Do Something About Costs! The Single Lawyer Solution
In an appendix to his judgment in the ruinous case of KSO v MJO & Ors [2008] EWHC 3031 (Fam), in which the parties managed to expend all but about 28% of the net assets in costs, Munby J returned us to Dickens’ excoriating passage in Bleak House:[[1]]
‘“For
Waking Up and Smelling the Coffee – International Tax Considerations in Financial Remedy Applications
This article came to be written via a chance meeting in a coffee shop between Sarah Lucy Cooper, a family practitioner specialising in international cases, and Dilpreet Dhanoa, a specialist in tax, one early morning on the way to court.
The purpose of this article is not to provide an
Predatory Marriage – The Great Inheritance Scam?
The term ‘predatory marriage’ is not a legal concept, but rather a convenient descriptor for a marriage entered into in circumstances where one party to the marriage is vulnerable and has been induced to enter into the marriage by the other party who is acting solely for financial gain. The