Enforcement (International) Contempt of Court Committal Applications and Judgment Summonses Service Collardeau v Fuchs: Contempt of Court [2025] EWFC 413 Poole J. An application for committal to prison for contempt of court following alleged breaches of an order made varying a final financial order.
Periodical Payments Variation Applications Undertakings ABC v XYZ (Financial Remedies: Release from Undertakings and Variation of Periodical Payments Order) [2025] EWFC 370 (B) DJ Maddison. Application by H to be released from undertakings and vary a nominal maintenance order following a significant change of circumstances. Reassessment of needs resulted in substantive joint lives provision.
Nullity Non-Qualifying Ceremony Lex Loci Celebrationis KU v BI [2025] EWFC 296 (B) Williams DDJ. Final hearing concerning the validity of a foreign marriage and whether financial remedy proceedings could be pursued.
Wells Sharing ED v AP [2025] EWFC 399 Judgment date: 23 September 2025 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/399 HHJ Hess (sitting as deputy High Court judge). Final hearing in financial remedy proceedings. The judge dealt with how to formulate a fair Wells sharing order concerning contingent interests the Husband might receive as a result of
Companies Company Valuations Spousal Maintenance (Quantum) NI v AD [2025] EWHC 2997 (Fam) Trowell J. Wife (NI) and husband (AD) cohabited for 7 years and share 3 children, aged, 11, 9 and 8 years. This is a cross application for financial relief upon their divorce. Oral evidence was heard from husband, wife and two expert forensic accountants.
Trusts Needs Life Expectancy Terminal Illness OO v QQ [2025] EWFC 310 (B) HHJ Hyde KC. Final hearing in financial remedy proceedings. The husband had failed to engage with most of the process. The case was determined on a needs basis given the wife’s terminal cancer diagnosis.
Costs Part III TY v XA (No 3) [2025] EWFC 350 Cusworth J. Wife is granted a costs order for her ‘disproportionate’ legal costs on the standard basis due to husband’s ‘normal’ litigation misconduct.