Cases Compensation Principle Open in RP v RP [2006] EWHC 3409 (Fam) Judgment date: 08 December 2006http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2006/3409.html Related BI v EN [2024] EWFC 200 (Fam) Judgment date: 29 July 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/200 Decision of Cusworth J concluding financial remedy proceedings between W and H. The principal issue concerned the extent to which the outcome of W’s application for financial remedies should be impacted by the ‘Contrat de Mariage’ AT v BT [2023] EWHC 3531 (Fam) Judgment date: 06 November 2023 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/3531 Francis J. A final hearing in H’s financial remedy application. W sought a lump sum of £9.145m on the basis of sharing and compensation. H asserted this was a needs case due to the H v W [2023] EWFC 120 Judgment date: 14 July 2023 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2023/120.html HHJ Reardon KC. This case concerns cross-applications regarding a final financial remedy order made in May 2021 (the 2021 order) by Recorder Anderson. This included an application by H for a further lump sum Read the journal Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 2 | Summer Open in Related BI v EN [2024] EWFC 200 (Fam) Judgment date: 29 July 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/200 Decision of Cusworth J concluding financial remedy proceedings between W and H. The principal issue concerned the extent to which the outcome of W’s application for financial remedies should be impacted by the ‘Contrat de Mariage’ AT v BT [2023] EWHC 3531 (Fam) Judgment date: 06 November 2023 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/3531 Francis J. A final hearing in H’s financial remedy application. W sought a lump sum of £9.145m on the basis of sharing and compensation. H asserted this was a needs case due to the H v W [2023] EWFC 120 Judgment date: 14 July 2023 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2023/120.html HHJ Reardon KC. This case concerns cross-applications regarding a final financial remedy order made in May 2021 (the 2021 order) by Recorder Anderson. This included an application by H for a further lump sum Latest My Time on the Family Procedure Rule Committee The Vice Chair of the FRJ Editorial Board talks about his six years as a barrister member of the Family Procedure Rule Committee. Intervenor Cases: Preliminary Issue Hearing or FDR (or NCDR)? Should case management decisions in intervenor cases place greater focus on the opportunities presented by an FDR or NCDR taking place prior to a preliminary issue hearing? Standish One Year On – Is There Agreement As to What It Means? The question of whether property that is matrimonial property has as a consequence to be shared equally has become one of the main areas of debate in the first instance decisions over the last year. is curated by The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS
BI v EN [2024] EWFC 200 (Fam) Judgment date: 29 July 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/200 Decision of Cusworth J concluding financial remedy proceedings between W and H. The principal issue concerned the extent to which the outcome of W’s application for financial remedies should be impacted by the ‘Contrat de Mariage’
AT v BT [2023] EWHC 3531 (Fam) Judgment date: 06 November 2023 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/3531 Francis J. A final hearing in H’s financial remedy application. W sought a lump sum of £9.145m on the basis of sharing and compensation. H asserted this was a needs case due to the
H v W [2023] EWFC 120 Judgment date: 14 July 2023 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2023/120.html HHJ Reardon KC. This case concerns cross-applications regarding a final financial remedy order made in May 2021 (the 2021 order) by Recorder Anderson. This included an application by H for a further lump sum
BI v EN [2024] EWFC 200 (Fam) Judgment date: 29 July 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/200 Decision of Cusworth J concluding financial remedy proceedings between W and H. The principal issue concerned the extent to which the outcome of W’s application for financial remedies should be impacted by the ‘Contrat de Mariage’
AT v BT [2023] EWHC 3531 (Fam) Judgment date: 06 November 2023 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/3531 Francis J. A final hearing in H’s financial remedy application. W sought a lump sum of £9.145m on the basis of sharing and compensation. H asserted this was a needs case due to the
H v W [2023] EWFC 120 Judgment date: 14 July 2023 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2023/120.html HHJ Reardon KC. This case concerns cross-applications regarding a final financial remedy order made in May 2021 (the 2021 order) by Recorder Anderson. This included an application by H for a further lump sum
My Time on the Family Procedure Rule Committee The Vice Chair of the FRJ Editorial Board talks about his six years as a barrister member of the Family Procedure Rule Committee.
Intervenor Cases: Preliminary Issue Hearing or FDR (or NCDR)? Should case management decisions in intervenor cases place greater focus on the opportunities presented by an FDR or NCDR taking place prior to a preliminary issue hearing?
Standish One Year On – Is There Agreement As to What It Means? The question of whether property that is matrimonial property has as a consequence to be shared equally has become one of the main areas of debate in the first instance decisions over the last year.