RP v RP [2006] EWHC 3409 (Fam)
Judgment date: 08 December 2006
Related
BI v EN [2024] EWFC 200 (Fam)
Judgment date: 29 July 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/200
Decision of Cusworth J concluding financial remedy proceedings between W and H. The principal issue concerned the extent to which the outcome of W’s application for financial remedies should be impacted by the ‘Contrat de Mariage’
AT v BT [2023] EWHC 3531 (Fam)
Judgment date: 06 November 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/3531
Francis J. A final hearing in H’s financial remedy application.
W sought a lump sum of £9.145m on the basis of sharing and compensation. H asserted this was a needs case due to the
H v W [2023] EWFC 120
Judgment date: 14 July 2023
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2023/120.html
HHJ Reardon KC. This case concerns cross-applications regarding a final financial remedy order made in May 2021 (the 2021 order) by Recorder Anderson. This included an application by H for a further lump sum
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 2 | Summer
Related
BI v EN [2024] EWFC 200 (Fam)
Judgment date: 29 July 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/200
Decision of Cusworth J concluding financial remedy proceedings between W and H. The principal issue concerned the extent to which the outcome of W’s application for financial remedies should be impacted by the ‘Contrat de Mariage’
AT v BT [2023] EWHC 3531 (Fam)
Judgment date: 06 November 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/3531
Francis J. A final hearing in H’s financial remedy application.
W sought a lump sum of £9.145m on the basis of sharing and compensation. H asserted this was a needs case due to the
H v W [2023] EWFC 120
Judgment date: 14 July 2023
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2023/120.html
HHJ Reardon KC. This case concerns cross-applications regarding a final financial remedy order made in May 2021 (the 2021 order) by Recorder Anderson. This included an application by H for a further lump sum
Latest
Tech Corner: Only 11%. What Technology Can Do About the Pensions Gap on Divorce
[2026] 3 FRJ 266. Only 11% of divorcees with a pension not yet in payment made any arrangement to share it, according to the Fair Shares study, which also found that over a third of divorcees did not know the value of their own pension. Ignoring the pensions is not an option.
Costs in Financial Remedy Proceedings: Time for Greater Discipline?
[2026] 3 FRJ 206. If costs discipline is to be meaningful, parties must understand from the outset that disproportionate litigation expenditure will ultimately remain their own responsibility even in a needs case. Money spent on costs is money removed from the resources available to the family.
IFoA Working Party for Pensions on Divorce: Full Resources Now Published
Building on the work of the Pensions Advisory Group and the IFoA thematic review of work by actuary PODEs, an IFoA working party has published essential new materials to further develop good practice in this area. Family lawyers should look for, and request, PODE adoption of these materials.