RP v RP [2006] EWHC 3409 (Fam)

Judgment date: 08 December 2006

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2006/3409.html

Related

BI v EN [2024] EWFC 200 (Fam)

Judgment date: 29 July 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/200 Decision of Cusworth J concluding financial remedy proceedings between W and H. The principal issue concerned the extent to which the outcome of W’s application for financial remedies should be impacted by the ‘Contrat de Mariage’

AT v BT [2023] EWHC 3531 (Fam)

Judgment date: 06 November 2023 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/3531 Francis J. A final hearing in H’s financial remedy application. W sought a lump sum of £9.145m on the basis of sharing and compensation. H asserted this was a needs case due to the

H v W [2023] EWFC 120

Judgment date: 14 July 2023 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2023/120.html HHJ Reardon KC. This case concerns cross-applications regarding a final financial remedy order made in May 2021 (the 2021 order) by Recorder Anderson. This included an application by H for a further lump sum

Read the journal

Related

BI v EN [2024] EWFC 200 (Fam)

Judgment date: 29 July 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/200 Decision of Cusworth J concluding financial remedy proceedings between W and H. The principal issue concerned the extent to which the outcome of W’s application for financial remedies should be impacted by the ‘Contrat de Mariage’

AT v BT [2023] EWHC 3531 (Fam)

Judgment date: 06 November 2023 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/3531 Francis J. A final hearing in H’s financial remedy application. W sought a lump sum of £9.145m on the basis of sharing and compensation. H asserted this was a needs case due to the

H v W [2023] EWFC 120

Judgment date: 14 July 2023 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2023/120.html HHJ Reardon KC. This case concerns cross-applications regarding a final financial remedy order made in May 2021 (the 2021 order) by Recorder Anderson. This included an application by H for a further lump sum

Latest

Pets on Divorce and Separation: Why the Consultation Matters

Pets on Divorce and Separation: Why the Consultation Matters

The Working Group on Pets on Divorce and Separation is concerned about the lack of guidance in relation to pets as chattels. The current reform project provides an opportunity to consider whether the approach taken in jurisdictions such as Spain and Australia would be appropriate here.

Bringing Child Welfare to the Fore: Why the Financial Remedies Reform Consultation Should Unify the Section 25 Checklist

Bringing Child Welfare to the Fore: Why the Financial Remedies Reform Consultation Should Unify the Section 25 Checklist

Caroline Bowden, Sophie Connors and James Pirrie, working as part of a reform sub-group of the Family Solutions Group, propose an adjustment of s 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, merging and reassembling subsections (2) and (3).

A Fairer End to Relationships? Some Reflections on the Core Principles of the Government’s Proposals to Reform the Law of Financial Remedies on Divorce.

A Fairer End to Relationships? Some Reflections on the Core Principles of the Government’s Proposals to Reform the Law of Financial Remedies on Divorce.

In June 2026, the Ministry of Justice published ‘A fairer end to relationships’, a wide-ranging consultation on reforms to the law of financial remedies on divorce, and to the position of cohabitants. This piece focuses on the central principles of the proposed reforms.

is curated by

The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software

EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS