RP v RP [2006] EWHC 3409 (Fam)

Judgment date: 08 December 2006

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2006/3409.html

Related

BI v EN [2024] EWFC 200 (Fam)

Judgment date: 29 July 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/200 Decision of Cusworth J concluding financial remedy proceedings between W and H. The principal issue concerned the extent to which the outcome of W’s application for financial remedies should be impacted by the ‘Contrat de Mariage’

AT v BT [2023] EWHC 3531 (Fam)

Judgment date: 06 November 2023 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/3531 Francis J. A final hearing in H’s financial remedy application. W sought a lump sum of £9.145m on the basis of sharing and compensation. H asserted this was a needs case due to the

H v W [2023] EWFC 120

Judgment date: 14 July 2023 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2023/120.html HHJ Reardon KC. This case concerns cross-applications regarding a final financial remedy order made in May 2021 (the 2021 order) by Recorder Anderson. This included an application by H for a further lump sum

Read the journal

Related

BI v EN [2024] EWFC 200 (Fam)

Judgment date: 29 July 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/200 Decision of Cusworth J concluding financial remedy proceedings between W and H. The principal issue concerned the extent to which the outcome of W’s application for financial remedies should be impacted by the ‘Contrat de Mariage’

AT v BT [2023] EWHC 3531 (Fam)

Judgment date: 06 November 2023 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/3531 Francis J. A final hearing in H’s financial remedy application. W sought a lump sum of £9.145m on the basis of sharing and compensation. H asserted this was a needs case due to the

H v W [2023] EWFC 120

Judgment date: 14 July 2023 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2023/120.html HHJ Reardon KC. This case concerns cross-applications regarding a final financial remedy order made in May 2021 (the 2021 order) by Recorder Anderson. This included an application by H for a further lump sum

Latest

The Fairer End to Relationships Consultation: The FRJ's Complete Coverage

The Fairer End to Relationships Consultation: The FRJ's Complete Coverage

The Government's Fairer End to Relationships consultation has sparked significant discussion about the future of cohabitation, marriage, divorce and financial remedies on relationship breakdown. Throughout the consultation period, we have published a series of articles exploring the key proposals, their potential impact on individuals and families, and the

What Family Lawyers Can Learn from Both Sides of the Border

What Family Lawyers Can Learn from Both Sides of the Border

Reform of this scale invites comparison. At a recent roundtable, family law specialists from Hugh James and Brodies brought together practitioners from Wales and Scotland to test where each jurisdiction might learn from the other.

Burning Down the House (That We Once Shared for 3 Years) to Roast the Pig: The Problem with the Cohabitation Reform Proposals

Burning Down the House (That We Once Shared for 3 Years) to Roast the Pig: The Problem with the Cohabitation Reform Proposals

Part 2 of the Ministry of Justice’s consultation paper, A Fairer End to Relationships, proposes a financial remedies scheme for cohabitants on separation. It casts the net far too wide. If legislation goes through as proposed, an unfair regime will be foisted on millions of couples.

is curated by

The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software

EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS