RP v RP [2006] EWHC 3409 (Fam)

Judgment date: 08 December 2006

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2006/3409.html

Related

BI v EN [2024] EWFC 200 (Fam)

Judgment date: 29 July 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/200 Decision of Cusworth J concluding financial remedy proceedings between W and H. The principal issue concerned the extent to which the outcome of W’s application for financial remedies should be impacted by the ‘Contrat de Mariage’

AT v BT [2023] EWHC 3531 (Fam)

Judgment date: 06 November 2023 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/3531 Francis J. A final hearing in H’s financial remedy application. W sought a lump sum of £9.145m on the basis of sharing and compensation. H asserted this was a needs case due to the

H v W [2023] EWFC 120

Judgment date: 14 July 2023 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2023/120.html HHJ Reardon KC. This case concerns cross-applications regarding a final financial remedy order made in May 2021 (the 2021 order) by Recorder Anderson. This included an application by H for a further lump sum

Read the journal

Related

BI v EN [2024] EWFC 200 (Fam)

Judgment date: 29 July 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/200 Decision of Cusworth J concluding financial remedy proceedings between W and H. The principal issue concerned the extent to which the outcome of W’s application for financial remedies should be impacted by the ‘Contrat de Mariage’

AT v BT [2023] EWHC 3531 (Fam)

Judgment date: 06 November 2023 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/3531 Francis J. A final hearing in H’s financial remedy application. W sought a lump sum of £9.145m on the basis of sharing and compensation. H asserted this was a needs case due to the

H v W [2023] EWFC 120

Judgment date: 14 July 2023 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2023/120.html HHJ Reardon KC. This case concerns cross-applications regarding a final financial remedy order made in May 2021 (the 2021 order) by Recorder Anderson. This included an application by H for a further lump sum

Latest

Maybe Compensation Isn’t What You Think

Maybe Compensation Isn’t What You Think

[2026] 2 FRJ 118. The compensation principle set out in Miller; McFarlane is the logical next step in ending discrimination between different but equal contributions. Compensation is a vehicle to alleviate post-divorce disparity, to give both spouses an equal start on the road to independent living.

Mind the Gap: A Chancery Barrister’s Preliminary Thoughts on the Cohabitation Reform Consultation

Mind the Gap: A Chancery Barrister’s Preliminary Thoughts on the Cohabitation Reform Consultation

The Ministry of Justice has released its long-anticipated consultation paper on family law and cohabitation reform. A practitioner gives her immediate reaction to the proposed reforms.

Cohabitation Law Reform – Perspectives North and South of the Anglo-Scottish Border

Cohabitation Law Reform – Perspectives North and South of the Anglo-Scottish Border

[2026] 2 FRJ 147. This article outlines the current relief available for cohabitants in the English and Scottish jurisdictions, the likely direction of travel for legislative reform and what we are likely to be left with. Will the Berwick man have greater clarity, or be even more confused?

is curated by

The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software

EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS