Ratcliffe v Ratcliffe [2021] EWCA Civ 247

Judgment date: 01 March 2021

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2021/247.html

Related

A v Z [2026] EWHC 654 (Fam)

Trowell J. Final hearing in a high net worth financial remedies case concerning the effect of a prenuptial agreement on shares transferred to the husband in companies forming part of the wife’s family business group during the marriage.

Needs Must as the Devil Drives: An Analysis of Pension Sharing in Needs Cases

[2026] 1 FRJ 43. Despite PAG1 and W v H [2020] EWFC B10 stressing the importance of treating a case on its own facts, somehow a view developed that pensions should inevitably be divided to achieve equality of income in all ‘needs’ cases. The source is unclear, but it’s worth starting with PAG1.

BS v HC [2026] EWFC 20 (B)

HHJ Hess. Final hearing in financial remedies proceedings. HHJ Hess dealt with questions of ‘matrimonialisation’ surrounding H’s pensions in light of the decision in Standish.

Read the journal

Related

A v Z [2026] EWHC 654 (Fam)

Trowell J. Final hearing in a high net worth financial remedies case concerning the effect of a prenuptial agreement on shares transferred to the husband in companies forming part of the wife’s family business group during the marriage.

Needs Must as the Devil Drives: An Analysis of Pension Sharing in Needs Cases

[2026] 1 FRJ 43. Despite PAG1 and W v H [2020] EWFC B10 stressing the importance of treating a case on its own facts, somehow a view developed that pensions should inevitably be divided to achieve equality of income in all ‘needs’ cases. The source is unclear, but it’s worth starting with PAG1.

BS v HC [2026] EWFC 20 (B)

HHJ Hess. Final hearing in financial remedies proceedings. HHJ Hess dealt with questions of ‘matrimonialisation’ surrounding H’s pensions in light of the decision in Standish.

Latest

How are family lawyers really approaching legal research and technology?

Class Legal is reviewing its products, resources, and customer behaviour to better understand what practitioners need.

Interview with Richard Sax

Interview with Richard Sax

On 11 February 2026 there was a celebratory lunch with the past recipients of Resolution’s John Cornwell Lifetime Achievement Award, organised by David Emmerson, who here interviews Richard Sax.

The Curious Case of CA 1989 Schedule 1 paragraph 2(3)

The Curious Case of CA 1989 Schedule 1 paragraph 2(3)

Paragraph 1 of CA 1989 Schedule 1 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief against parents’. Paragraph 2 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief for persons over eighteen’. As recent cases have demonstrated this structure causes complications.

is curated by

The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software

EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS