MCJ v MAJ [2016] EWHC 1672 (Fam)
Judgment date: 06 July 2016
Related
HC v SW [2026] EWFC 237
13 July 2026. Trowell J. Final hearing to determine the extent to which one party's receipt of restricted stock units and carried interest post-separation should be considered matrimonial property and subject to sharing.
RRE v JPR [2026] EWFC 7
13 January 2026. Sir Jonathan Cohen. Final hearing in financial remedies proceedings in which W held the majority of the parties’ wealth as a result of tax planning and distributions from H, whose wealth derived almost entirely from outside the marriage.
BC v BC (No 2) (Matrimonialisation; Division of Shareholding; Provision for Debt) [2026] EWFC 37
20 February 2026. Garrido J. Final hearing in financial remedies proceedings, considering matrimonialisation and whether there should be a departure from equality due to the shares’ original non-matrimonial character.
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 2 | Summer
Related
HC v SW [2026] EWFC 237
13 July 2026. Trowell J. Final hearing to determine the extent to which one party's receipt of restricted stock units and carried interest post-separation should be considered matrimonial property and subject to sharing.
RRE v JPR [2026] EWFC 7
13 January 2026. Sir Jonathan Cohen. Final hearing in financial remedies proceedings in which W held the majority of the parties’ wealth as a result of tax planning and distributions from H, whose wealth derived almost entirely from outside the marriage.
BC v BC (No 2) (Matrimonialisation; Division of Shareholding; Provision for Debt) [2026] EWFC 37
20 February 2026. Garrido J. Final hearing in financial remedies proceedings, considering matrimonialisation and whether there should be a departure from equality due to the shares’ original non-matrimonial character.
Latest
Small Money Cases: Managing Financial Remedies Cases Where There Is Not Enough to Go Round
From possible insolvency to arguments about add-back, small money cases raise many of the same issues as big money cases yet are often the hardest fought and difficult to settle at the Financial Dispute Resolution (FDR) appointment. The difference is simply that there is not enough to go round.
Selling the Goose: Orders for Sale of the Family Company
[2026] 3 FRJ 194. This article considers recent authorities which suggest that forcing a sale of the family company may increasingly be contemplated by the court.
Tech Corner: Only 11%. What Technology Can Do About the Pensions Gap on Divorce
[2026] 3 FRJ 266. Only 11% of divorcees with a pension not yet in payment made any arrangement to share it, according to the Fair Shares study, which also found that over a third of divorcees did not know the value of their own pension. Ignoring the pensions is not an option.