author Open in Mark Harper Mark Harper is a partner at Hughes Fowler Carruthers. Related Read the journal Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 2 | Summer Open in Related Latest The Biggest Shake-Up of English Family Law in Over Two Decades? On 5 June 2026 the government published a Consultation Document titled ‘A Fairer End to Relationships’. This consultation will close on 14 August 2026. In this article, we explore exactly what is being proposed. Prioritising Children? Competing Principles in Financial Remedies Reform ‘A fairer end to relationships’ identifies four guiding principles, and these can pull in different directions. Whilst the consultation does not explain how the principles have been balanced with one another, such an analysis is essential to promote a coherent framework. Assessment of Hierarchical Needs Under the Government’s Proposed Reforms In an effort to introduce greater certainty, the Government has proposed a new hierarchical approach to be undertaken by the court when considering needs. The authors question whether, in practice, it will be easy to police such a distinction. Family lawyers are nothing if not creative. is curated by The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS
The Biggest Shake-Up of English Family Law in Over Two Decades? On 5 June 2026 the government published a Consultation Document titled ‘A Fairer End to Relationships’. This consultation will close on 14 August 2026. In this article, we explore exactly what is being proposed.
Prioritising Children? Competing Principles in Financial Remedies Reform ‘A fairer end to relationships’ identifies four guiding principles, and these can pull in different directions. Whilst the consultation does not explain how the principles have been balanced with one another, such an analysis is essential to promote a coherent framework.
Assessment of Hierarchical Needs Under the Government’s Proposed Reforms In an effort to introduce greater certainty, the Government has proposed a new hierarchical approach to be undertaken by the court when considering needs. The authors question whether, in practice, it will be easy to police such a distinction. Family lawyers are nothing if not creative.